conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
When people call rolled oats "traditional" as compared to whole or steel-cut oats.

How the heck can they be traditional? There's no way they were there first! They require more processing! (And somebody please explain to me why they cost more in stores when they're less work to make. Huh? They are less labor intensive from field to shelf, aren't they? Am I missing something?)

It's like this book I have, Alcatraz and the Evil Librarians (great book, by the way), and at one point one of his newfound comrades (Not From Here) comments that of course stairs are more advanced than elevators - they're healthier, they're harder to put in, and they don't break down! The fact that elevators require a greater understanding of mechanics to achieve is quite beside the point. It's the same with oats, or with organic farming. It's better in some way (not, obviously, every way or the other way would never have become so popular!) and it's new to these people, so they figure that it's new to everybody. (How many times do babywearers get told "they didn't have THAT when my kids were little!"? Well, slings are some of the oldest inventions of humankind. They did have it. You didn't, that's all.)

It just bugs me.

Date: 2008-12-28 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] breakableheart.livejournal.com
HAHA! The traditional foods people and Weston A Price people are somewhat... uh... demented about what they consider to be appropriate traditional foods. For instance all grains are a no-no! But coconut oil? Faboo!

Except they skip right over the fact that I'm basically northern european genetically so coconuts were nowhere near my ancestors' traditional foods...

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 05:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios