God, this person just does NOT give up!

[conuly]

And s/he is one serious-ass troll, too. One would think that anybody with sense would realize that disease is not caused by bad behaviour but by microscopic organisms, but apparently this person never got the memo.


http://www.livejournal.com/community/asperger/109164.html

Comments

[conuly]

That's my reckoning. Which really would even everything out.

And, get it straight. It's NOT gay sex putting you at a risk of STDs, it's promiscuity and a lack of appropriate protection. No, wishing and praying and hoping do NOT constitute appropriate protection, neither does ignorance. And, to be fair, if you are promiscuous ONLY with people who aren't infected, you're safe. It's a stupid thing to gamble on, but the risk comes from doing it with infected people.

Now. Let's take baby steps. Marriage != promiscuity. Marriage = monogamy (or at least fidelity if this is a plural marriage of some sort), or so one hopes. Marriage certainly != sex. You can have sex sans marriage and vice versa. So marriage would NOT raise the amount of AIDs and would probably lower the spread. I don't care about your insurance rates, frankly. Black people made property values drop, but guess what? Whites, racist or not, are STILL not allowed to refuse to sell their homes to black people.

[maladaptive.livejournal.com]

That was the other thing I wanted to mention, but as you'd said it already I figured it would be silly to say it in one of your own comments.

I love how banning people from getting married will cause AIDs to go down. Um? Married people don't have sex? News to me....

[conuly]

Y'know. I spelled that wrong. AIDS. Because the "s" stands for Syndrome. Is why AIDS in Spanish is SIDA.

[maladaptive.livejournal.com]

You know, I did too. It didn't even register. Woopsies.