One last post, before I sleep....
Feb. 6th, 2007 12:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
conuly
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/06/opinion/l06warm.html
As usual, the fashionable view eventually becomes tyrannical and will no longer permit debate. It looks now as if the momentum of the global-warming evangelists is unstoppable.
You state in your Feb. 3 front-page article that the United States accounts for 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s emissions. Somewhere between consuming and emitting fossil fuels is that thing called United States economic growth, which continues to be a boon to the world — for 2006, a sparkling 3.4 percent.
Some say they don’t want their children to have to cope with the alleged nightmare of climate change, but I am far sadder that my children will have to cope with the reduced richness of opportunity that will exist at every socioeconomic level in an economy crippled by restricted access to the energy that powers it.
It will be a sad sight to watch the spectacular American private-sector engine and the optimistic innovativeness that has always been its hallmark diminished for want of fuel.
She'd better get used to it. For better or for worse, the fuel was going to end eventually. If we end up switching to better sources of fuel, if we end up being less wasteful of it - there's still only so much oil in the world.
How short-sighted can you be, anyway? That's what I want to know. An "alleged" nightmare? As near as I can tell, it's already cost more than enough money in the US and overseas dealing with (not fixing) problems caused by climate change. That's an economic crisis right there, if you can't bring yourself to mind about human lives.
But, oh, don't mind me. It's not as though I've got evidence on my side or anything.
As usual, the fashionable view eventually becomes tyrannical and will no longer permit debate. It looks now as if the momentum of the global-warming evangelists is unstoppable.
You state in your Feb. 3 front-page article that the United States accounts for 5 percent of the world’s population and 25 percent of the world’s emissions. Somewhere between consuming and emitting fossil fuels is that thing called United States economic growth, which continues to be a boon to the world — for 2006, a sparkling 3.4 percent.
Some say they don’t want their children to have to cope with the alleged nightmare of climate change, but I am far sadder that my children will have to cope with the reduced richness of opportunity that will exist at every socioeconomic level in an economy crippled by restricted access to the energy that powers it.
It will be a sad sight to watch the spectacular American private-sector engine and the optimistic innovativeness that has always been its hallmark diminished for want of fuel.
She'd better get used to it. For better or for worse, the fuel was going to end eventually. If we end up switching to better sources of fuel, if we end up being less wasteful of it - there's still only so much oil in the world.
How short-sighted can you be, anyway? That's what I want to know. An "alleged" nightmare? As near as I can tell, it's already cost more than enough money in the US and overseas dealing with (not fixing) problems caused by climate change. That's an economic crisis right there, if you can't bring yourself to mind about human lives.
But, oh, don't mind me. It's not as though I've got evidence on my side or anything.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:19 am (UTC)Just found this while clicking around, and didn't know if you'd seen it yet.
She's a conserva-zombie, hon.
Date: 2007-02-06 07:03 am (UTC)Essentially, this idiot doesn't have a clue that science is not a matter of faith but a matter of fact. And we have facts. Our facts trump their faith any day of the week, unfortunately for them.
Re: She's a conserva-zombie, hon.
Date: 2007-02-06 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 04:53 am (UTC)And why does she think we can't take that "optimistic innovativeness" and turn it to creating a renewable fuel source? Sheesh. It's old-fashioned, fossil-fuel-guzzling Luddites like her that keep us back in the Dark Ages.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 05:19 am (UTC)Just found this while clicking around, and didn't know if you'd seen it yet.
She's a conserva-zombie, hon.
Date: 2007-02-06 07:03 am (UTC)Essentially, this idiot doesn't have a clue that science is not a matter of faith but a matter of fact. And we have facts. Our facts trump their faith any day of the week, unfortunately for them.
Re: She's a conserva-zombie, hon.
Date: 2007-02-06 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-07 04:53 am (UTC)And why does she think we can't take that "optimistic innovativeness" and turn it to creating a renewable fuel source? Sheesh. It's old-fashioned, fossil-fuel-guzzling Luddites like her that keep us back in the Dark Ages.