No, this isn't directed at YOU.
Mar. 27th, 2006 09:33 pmNot you either.
I've been linkhopping today, and in the meantime I figured out, finally, why it pisses me off when people start talking on and on about how they feel. Half the time, it strikes me as unbearably passive-aggressive.
Of course, as I just realized, that's because the people who do that the most really *are* passive-aggressive about it. Firm "I feel" statements are all well and good, but not when you're talking to people who "resent" such things as the bus running late. And at the same time that whoever-it-is is going on and on about how you "feel" offended and you "feel" insulted and you "feel" like nobody loves you, everybody hates you, you should just go and eat worms... you're not paying the least attention to what other people are saying. It's all about you.
Unfortunately, this little trick works. People fall all over themselves to reassure you that no, you're a wonderful human being, and your contributions are valuable, and nobody really meant *that*, when what they *should* be telling you is that your viewpoint isn't everything and that feeling isn't a substitute for thinking anyway.
And then, of course, when discussing feelings really *is* relevant, it comes off with that cloying heavy smell that the fake kind has, and it's absolutely unbearable.
Not that talking about your feelings is as relevant as some people think it is. If, for example, all we'd done is discuss how racial segregation made black people feel, nobody'd ever have done anything - after all, weren't the feelings of the racists just as valid? (They, of course, would've said their feelings were more valid.) All that needed to be said is "This is wrong, and it has to change".
I've been linkhopping today, and in the meantime I figured out, finally, why it pisses me off when people start talking on and on about how they feel. Half the time, it strikes me as unbearably passive-aggressive.
Of course, as I just realized, that's because the people who do that the most really *are* passive-aggressive about it. Firm "I feel" statements are all well and good, but not when you're talking to people who "resent" such things as the bus running late. And at the same time that whoever-it-is is going on and on about how you "feel" offended and you "feel" insulted and you "feel" like nobody loves you, everybody hates you, you should just go and eat worms... you're not paying the least attention to what other people are saying. It's all about you.
Unfortunately, this little trick works. People fall all over themselves to reassure you that no, you're a wonderful human being, and your contributions are valuable, and nobody really meant *that*, when what they *should* be telling you is that your viewpoint isn't everything and that feeling isn't a substitute for thinking anyway.
And then, of course, when discussing feelings really *is* relevant, it comes off with that cloying heavy smell that the fake kind has, and it's absolutely unbearable.
Not that talking about your feelings is as relevant as some people think it is. If, for example, all we'd done is discuss how racial segregation made black people feel, nobody'd ever have done anything - after all, weren't the feelings of the racists just as valid? (They, of course, would've said their feelings were more valid.) All that needed to be said is "This is wrong, and it has to change".
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 02:45 am (UTC)I'm glad you've said this. It's struck me this way as well.
I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 02:48 am (UTC)I really don't like "I think" and "I believe" too much in writing. It is okay in speech, which is generally less wired for rational argument unless you're my grandfather.
Sometimes talking about feelings CAN be passive aggressive. I know it in myself and HAVE used it this way. I will try not to in future. It possibly is a natural and normal thing to do when somboedy is insecure, but that doesn't make it right.
Adelaide
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 02:53 am (UTC)In writing, statements like that weaken the argument. In scientific writing, nobody cares what you think, they care what the evidence shows. In other forms of writing, you should know how to explain yourself clearly enough that the reader doesn't need a guide to your thoughts.
That's how I always learned it, anyway. There's a place for I statements, and formal writing generally isn't it.
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 02:57 am (UTC)I actually find formal writing easier than most informal writing simply because I don't have to be bogged down with "thinking", "believing", or ... "feeling".
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 03:00 am (UTC)They have a good place in informal writing, though I think some of us (me!) use them too much there.
I actually find formal writing easier than most informal writing simply because I don't have to be bogged down with "thinking", "believing", or ... "feeling".
*nods*
On the other hand, it's a lot easier to think something than to prove it.
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 03:02 am (UTC)You know, you said it, I read it, and I still missed it. It must be time for bed.
It is MUCH easier to think something than to prove it, that's for sure. I can think a million things I can never prove.
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 03:23 am (UTC)http://www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html
It was at the start of the year 2005 and it was pretty cool. It inspired me to write some things in that vein.
The current Edge has something about the thirtieth anniversary of The Selfish Gene. Do you think that's what's at work here?
Adelaide
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 03:41 am (UTC)People are silly, aren't they?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 02:19 pm (UTC)(I understand the need for discussion of feelings in some contexts, but they seem to pop in everywhere. I know a woman who used to be a social worker, which is I'm sure where she got this, and she constructs all conversation in "When you... I feel..." format. Drives me up the wall. Especially when she'll do this over life and death issues and claim that this is "empowerment" when her "I'm only speaking for myself" mode can screw over everyone but her who's affected by it, and then ends up screwing her over too because of how passive it makes her position.)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 02:45 am (UTC)I'm glad you've said this. It's struck me this way as well.
I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 02:48 am (UTC)I really don't like "I think" and "I believe" too much in writing. It is okay in speech, which is generally less wired for rational argument unless you're my grandfather.
Sometimes talking about feelings CAN be passive aggressive. I know it in myself and HAVE used it this way. I will try not to in future. It possibly is a natural and normal thing to do when somboedy is insecure, but that doesn't make it right.
Adelaide
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 02:53 am (UTC)In writing, statements like that weaken the argument. In scientific writing, nobody cares what you think, they care what the evidence shows. In other forms of writing, you should know how to explain yourself clearly enough that the reader doesn't need a guide to your thoughts.
That's how I always learned it, anyway. There's a place for I statements, and formal writing generally isn't it.
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 02:57 am (UTC)I actually find formal writing easier than most informal writing simply because I don't have to be bogged down with "thinking", "believing", or ... "feeling".
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 03:00 am (UTC)They have a good place in informal writing, though I think some of us (me!) use them too much there.
I actually find formal writing easier than most informal writing simply because I don't have to be bogged down with "thinking", "believing", or ... "feeling".
*nods*
On the other hand, it's a lot easier to think something than to prove it.
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 03:02 am (UTC)You know, you said it, I read it, and I still missed it. It must be time for bed.
It is MUCH easier to think something than to prove it, that's for sure. I can think a million things I can never prove.
Re: I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...
Date: 2006-03-28 03:23 am (UTC)http://www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html
It was at the start of the year 2005 and it was pretty cool. It inspired me to write some things in that vein.
The current Edge has something about the thirtieth anniversary of The Selfish Gene. Do you think that's what's at work here?
Adelaide
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 03:41 am (UTC)People are silly, aren't they?
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 02:19 pm (UTC)(I understand the need for discussion of feelings in some contexts, but they seem to pop in everywhere. I know a woman who used to be a social worker, which is I'm sure where she got this, and she constructs all conversation in "When you... I feel..." format. Drives me up the wall. Especially when she'll do this over life and death issues and claim that this is "empowerment" when her "I'm only speaking for myself" mode can screw over everyone but her who's affected by it, and then ends up screwing her over too because of how passive it makes her position.)
no subject
Date: 2006-03-28 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 01:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-03-29 01:24 am (UTC)