conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
Not you either.

I've been linkhopping today, and in the meantime I figured out, finally, why it pisses me off when people start talking on and on about how they feel. Half the time, it strikes me as unbearably passive-aggressive.

Of course, as I just realized, that's because the people who do that the most really *are* passive-aggressive about it. Firm "I feel" statements are all well and good, but not when you're talking to people who "resent" such things as the bus running late. And at the same time that whoever-it-is is going on and on about how you "feel" offended and you "feel" insulted and you "feel" like nobody loves you, everybody hates you, you should just go and eat worms... you're not paying the least attention to what other people are saying. It's all about you.

Unfortunately, this little trick works. People fall all over themselves to reassure you that no, you're a wonderful human being, and your contributions are valuable, and nobody really meant *that*, when what they *should* be telling you is that your viewpoint isn't everything and that feeling isn't a substitute for thinking anyway.

And then, of course, when discussing feelings really *is* relevant, it comes off with that cloying heavy smell that the fake kind has, and it's absolutely unbearable.

Not that talking about your feelings is as relevant as some people think it is. If, for example, all we'd done is discuss how racial segregation made black people feel, nobody'd ever have done anything - after all, weren't the feelings of the racists just as valid? (They, of course, would've said their feelings were more valid.) All that needed to be said is "This is wrong, and it has to change".

Date: 2006-03-28 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wodhaund.livejournal.com
I think this is exactly why my parents reinforced the use of "I think" and "I believe".

I'm glad you've said this. It's struck me this way as well.

I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...

Date: 2006-03-28 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] duponthumanite.livejournal.com
Your family were very wise, Spacemuffin.

I really don't like "I think" and "I believe" too much in writing. It is okay in speech, which is generally less wired for rational argument unless you're my grandfather.

Sometimes talking about feelings CAN be passive aggressive. I know it in myself and HAVE used it this way. I will try not to in future. It possibly is a natural and normal thing to do when somboedy is insecure, but that doesn't make it right.

Adelaide
From: [identity profile] wodhaund.livejournal.com
That's true. Although were you thinking of formal writing or something more like a journal? "I think" and "I believe" can still be useful in informal writing, although it does seem to depend on the situation.

I actually find formal writing easier than most informal writing simply because I don't have to be bogged down with "thinking", "believing", or ... "feeling".
From: [identity profile] wodhaund.livejournal.com
I specifically mentioned formal writing, near the end.

You know, you said it, I read it, and I still missed it. It must be time for bed.

It is MUCH easier to think something than to prove it, that's for sure. I can think a million things I can never prove.
From: [identity profile] duponthumanite.livejournal.com
I wonder if you and Conuly (this is informal writing, people!) have read 2004/05's Edge "Things I believe which I cannot prove ..."

http://www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html

It was at the start of the year 2005 and it was pretty cool. It inspired me to write some things in that vein.

The current Edge has something about the thirtieth anniversary of The Selfish Gene. Do you think that's what's at work here?

Adelaide

Date: 2006-03-28 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com
I feel attacked by this post! T___T

Date: 2006-03-28 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com
*G* Sorry, forgot to close my sarcasm tags.

People are silly, aren't they?

Date: 2006-03-28 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wakasplat.livejournal.com
I've just recently had a conversation with someone whose "I feel" mode seemed to be more important than right and wrong, than fact, or than anything else. Some people seem to worship feelings.

(I understand the need for discussion of feelings in some contexts, but they seem to pop in everywhere. I know a woman who used to be a social worker, which is I'm sure where she got this, and she constructs all conversation in "When you... I feel..." format. Drives me up the wall. Especially when she'll do this over life and death issues and claim that this is "empowerment" when her "I'm only speaking for myself" mode can screw over everyone but her who's affected by it, and then ends up screwing her over too because of how passive it makes her position.)

Date: 2006-03-28 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stagemanager.livejournal.com
I'm sorry. (And I'm not being passive-aggressive with this, I'm truly sorry.) 'Nuff said.

Date: 2006-03-28 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wodhaund.livejournal.com
I think this is exactly why my parents reinforced the use of "I think" and "I believe".

I'm glad you've said this. It's struck me this way as well.

I think and I believe - appropriate usage of ...

Date: 2006-03-28 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] duponthumanite.livejournal.com
Your family were very wise, Spacemuffin.

I really don't like "I think" and "I believe" too much in writing. It is okay in speech, which is generally less wired for rational argument unless you're my grandfather.

Sometimes talking about feelings CAN be passive aggressive. I know it in myself and HAVE used it this way. I will try not to in future. It possibly is a natural and normal thing to do when somboedy is insecure, but that doesn't make it right.

Adelaide
From: [identity profile] wodhaund.livejournal.com
That's true. Although were you thinking of formal writing or something more like a journal? "I think" and "I believe" can still be useful in informal writing, although it does seem to depend on the situation.

I actually find formal writing easier than most informal writing simply because I don't have to be bogged down with "thinking", "believing", or ... "feeling".
From: [identity profile] wodhaund.livejournal.com
I specifically mentioned formal writing, near the end.

You know, you said it, I read it, and I still missed it. It must be time for bed.

It is MUCH easier to think something than to prove it, that's for sure. I can think a million things I can never prove.
From: [identity profile] duponthumanite.livejournal.com
I wonder if you and Conuly (this is informal writing, people!) have read 2004/05's Edge "Things I believe which I cannot prove ..."

http://www.edge.org/q2005/q05_print.html

It was at the start of the year 2005 and it was pretty cool. It inspired me to write some things in that vein.

The current Edge has something about the thirtieth anniversary of The Selfish Gene. Do you think that's what's at work here?

Adelaide

Date: 2006-03-28 03:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com
I feel attacked by this post! T___T

Date: 2006-03-28 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mhari.livejournal.com
*G* Sorry, forgot to close my sarcasm tags.

People are silly, aren't they?

Date: 2006-03-28 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wakasplat.livejournal.com
I've just recently had a conversation with someone whose "I feel" mode seemed to be more important than right and wrong, than fact, or than anything else. Some people seem to worship feelings.

(I understand the need for discussion of feelings in some contexts, but they seem to pop in everywhere. I know a woman who used to be a social worker, which is I'm sure where she got this, and she constructs all conversation in "When you... I feel..." format. Drives me up the wall. Especially when she'll do this over life and death issues and claim that this is "empowerment" when her "I'm only speaking for myself" mode can screw over everyone but her who's affected by it, and then ends up screwing her over too because of how passive it makes her position.)

Date: 2006-03-28 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stagemanager.livejournal.com
I'm sorry. (And I'm not being passive-aggressive with this, I'm truly sorry.) 'Nuff said.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 08:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios