![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
You've seen this? Good.
What gets me is not all the "proof" that Ron is or could become abusive, but the follow-up that because he's headed in that direction he "will hit Hermione". He will? Why?
Has Ron ever been shown to be particularly violent? I know he's jinxed people - but so does everybody else in that god-forsaken school, and they think this is all in good fun. So, again I say - violent? Won-won? Hermione's more violent than he is!
His lack of violence would not, of course, make him not abusive. I understand that. Indeed, I've often considered that the Weasley household is full of borderline emotional abuse (something I *would* consider a warning sign for what Ron may do in the future - but again, have we ever seen any violence among the family members?) I get that there's other forms of abuse besides hitting people.
But do the authors of this article get that? Because they take this evidence that's kinda sorta convincing (not really, mihi, but I can see how they can come to that conclusion) and then go straight into the twilight zone with this hitting thing. I just don't see it, really.
And I'm posting this just to remind all of youse that yes, there's other forms of abuse out there. Really.
Link from
ciara_belle
What gets me is not all the "proof" that Ron is or could become abusive, but the follow-up that because he's headed in that direction he "will hit Hermione". He will? Why?
Has Ron ever been shown to be particularly violent? I know he's jinxed people - but so does everybody else in that god-forsaken school, and they think this is all in good fun. So, again I say - violent? Won-won? Hermione's more violent than he is!
His lack of violence would not, of course, make him not abusive. I understand that. Indeed, I've often considered that the Weasley household is full of borderline emotional abuse (something I *would* consider a warning sign for what Ron may do in the future - but again, have we ever seen any violence among the family members?) I get that there's other forms of abuse besides hitting people.
But do the authors of this article get that? Because they take this evidence that's kinda sorta convincing (not really, mihi, but I can see how they can come to that conclusion) and then go straight into the twilight zone with this hitting thing. I just don't see it, really.
And I'm posting this just to remind all of youse that yes, there's other forms of abuse out there. Really.
Link from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 09:50 am (UTC)I especially like the quote about the Slug Club and how he had a rapid mood shift oh my god no. Or it could be that he felt embarrassed for having jumped to conclusions, or behaved badly....
Also, according to the Dear Abby thing, being into BDSM is a sign of abuse. That irks me, but in a smaller fashion because I'm generally used to it, and I would hazard a guess that they don't really mean it that way. But I wonder if it made anyone whose partner is more into BDSM than they are think that said partner might actually be abusive.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:07 am (UTC)Fred and/or George, though... they're far more likely to smack around their S.O., and I don't think they're capable of not being emotionally abusive.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 03:06 pm (UTC)...I shall attack you with transfigured canaries now!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:32 am (UTC)Ron does act badly, but I do think it's because he's immature. And I'd give him a chance to grow up. There are risks, yes, and warning signs. But I wouldn't be surprised if he managed to outgrow it.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 01:03 pm (UTC)Harry is the one who holds it all in and one day is going to take out a MacDonald's or fly into a tower. What exactly will he do when the focus of his anger is gone and he's left to deal with being abused his whole childhood and left with all his emotions?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 02:52 pm (UTC)What? Hermione is an insecure and emotional little git-- brilliant or not, she's something of an idiot and has been since book one. I, frankly, love her for it. People think that the last book ruined her because she got overly emotional.
She does it ALL THE TIME! Attacking Ron with canaries after he's been smarmy is not at all out of character. And if anything in that relationship, Hermione would totally dominate-- I feel like they'd grow up to be like Molly and Arthur, somewhat. Ron, abusive?
Pick another straw to grab. Eeesh.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 03:03 pm (UTC)However, I do like the close reading of the texts. The editors have to really dive in to get all that out of the six books available. A New Critic would be proud.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 09:50 am (UTC)I especially like the quote about the Slug Club and how he had a rapid mood shift oh my god no. Or it could be that he felt embarrassed for having jumped to conclusions, or behaved badly....
Also, according to the Dear Abby thing, being into BDSM is a sign of abuse. That irks me, but in a smaller fashion because I'm generally used to it, and I would hazard a guess that they don't really mean it that way. But I wonder if it made anyone whose partner is more into BDSM than they are think that said partner might actually be abusive.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:07 am (UTC)Fred and/or George, though... they're far more likely to smack around their S.O., and I don't think they're capable of not being emotionally abusive.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 03:06 pm (UTC)...I shall attack you with transfigured canaries now!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 06:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 10:32 am (UTC)Ron does act badly, but I do think it's because he's immature. And I'd give him a chance to grow up. There are risks, yes, and warning signs. But I wouldn't be surprised if he managed to outgrow it.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 01:03 pm (UTC)Harry is the one who holds it all in and one day is going to take out a MacDonald's or fly into a tower. What exactly will he do when the focus of his anger is gone and he's left to deal with being abused his whole childhood and left with all his emotions?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 02:52 pm (UTC)What? Hermione is an insecure and emotional little git-- brilliant or not, she's something of an idiot and has been since book one. I, frankly, love her for it. People think that the last book ruined her because she got overly emotional.
She does it ALL THE TIME! Attacking Ron with canaries after he's been smarmy is not at all out of character. And if anything in that relationship, Hermione would totally dominate-- I feel like they'd grow up to be like Molly and Arthur, somewhat. Ron, abusive?
Pick another straw to grab. Eeesh.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-29 03:03 pm (UTC)However, I do like the close reading of the texts. The editors have to really dive in to get all that out of the six books available. A New Critic would be proud.