My serious post about left-handedness
Aug. 13th, 2005 12:36 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
conuly
Gee, left-handedness makes a great analogy.
I mean, consider it.
Some 10% of the population. Used to be horribly oppressed, forced to hide who they were. Now, we are much more civilized now, and nobody forces lefties to change. Except that the world still isn't set up fairly. You don't think about it, you get so used to crossing over your arms, or taking off your watch to set it, or just using The Other Hand for everything, but... man, now that I'm thinking about it, I'm getting annoyed. (Oh, and side note - ambidextrous scissors? Suck. They're jointed the wrong way, so they're really just righty scissors with uncomfortable handles. Gee, thanks.)
Plus, everybody in the English-speaking world knows a lefty or is a lefty, and many of them inexplicably think left-handedness is cool. Or something.
But despite the loose pride that comes from YAY BEING LEFTY, nobody thinks we're out to recruit their young or push our agenda. Why? Because as far as anybody really cares, all the problems are settled. We can marry whomever we want, and nobody thinks they need to change lefties, even when it's associated with such dread conditions as liberalism, homosexuality, schizophrenia, and being an actor... life is good!
So, as I said, it makes a good analogy. Quick looks at google will prove this. Left-handedness can be compared to homosexuality, to disability in general, to deafness, to autism (you knew I'd get to this eventually), to blindness… I’m sure you can think of other searches to run.
And, y’know, it makes sense.
Oftentimes you hear people saying things along the lines that “well, we don’t need a cure for this just because ‘life is difficult’. I mean, life is difficult for black people in this country, statistic statistic statistic, but you wouldn’t suggest the solution is to cure blackness!”
I recently read this post in somebody’s blog, didn’t think that much of it. It talks about access, and recounts the recitation of a story about a woman who couldn’t use the bathroom because she was black. It just draws a simple comparison.
And then I find out that somebody read this whole post, and decided it was racist. She says that “The truth of the matter is that if you or Cass Irvin had been rolling along the fictional street described in the reading looking for a bathroom, as white people you would have been allowed to use one. As people in wheelchairs, you might have had difficulty reaching the bathroom or the toilet itself, but you would not have been excluded by law or custom.” I honestly haven’t the slightest idea what to say to this, but I digress.
Or, not really. When you compare anything you want to left-handedness, you have to worry that people will say you’re downplaying it – after all, not being able to use scissors without immense difficulty isn’t at all the same as, say, not being able to use the bathroom. Unless, of course, you think that an inability to get into the bathroom is a bit of a “difficulty”. Me, I assume that deliberately designing buildings that leave people out (or not providing actual lefty scissors, though I do agree this isn’t on the same level) is excluding people by custom.
So I don’t know. Maybe, to some people, there is no way to trivialize arguments over accessible bathrooms, or cures for everything under the sun, or that kid Zach being locked up by his parents – maybe to some people, anything they don’t want to think about, any time they want to ignore their complicity in something, the issue is automatically trivial.
I know I rambled a lot. I'm sorry. I wanted to say something important to mark the occasion. I don't know if I actually hit on important, but I think I at least managed sincere.
Incidentally, all my google searching scared me. In the process of writing this post, I came across things like this. I'd almost put the nonsense surrounding that article (which I rather liked, linked to, and should find to post up again) out of my mind entirely.
I mean, consider it.
Some 10% of the population. Used to be horribly oppressed, forced to hide who they were. Now, we are much more civilized now, and nobody forces lefties to change. Except that the world still isn't set up fairly. You don't think about it, you get so used to crossing over your arms, or taking off your watch to set it, or just using The Other Hand for everything, but... man, now that I'm thinking about it, I'm getting annoyed. (Oh, and side note - ambidextrous scissors? Suck. They're jointed the wrong way, so they're really just righty scissors with uncomfortable handles. Gee, thanks.)
Plus, everybody in the English-speaking world knows a lefty or is a lefty, and many of them inexplicably think left-handedness is cool. Or something.
But despite the loose pride that comes from YAY BEING LEFTY, nobody thinks we're out to recruit their young or push our agenda. Why? Because as far as anybody really cares, all the problems are settled. We can marry whomever we want, and nobody thinks they need to change lefties, even when it's associated with such dread conditions as liberalism, homosexuality, schizophrenia, and being an actor... life is good!
So, as I said, it makes a good analogy. Quick looks at google will prove this. Left-handedness can be compared to homosexuality, to disability in general, to deafness, to autism (you knew I'd get to this eventually), to blindness… I’m sure you can think of other searches to run.
And, y’know, it makes sense.
Oftentimes you hear people saying things along the lines that “well, we don’t need a cure for this just because ‘life is difficult’. I mean, life is difficult for black people in this country, statistic statistic statistic, but you wouldn’t suggest the solution is to cure blackness!”
I recently read this post in somebody’s blog, didn’t think that much of it. It talks about access, and recounts the recitation of a story about a woman who couldn’t use the bathroom because she was black. It just draws a simple comparison.
And then I find out that somebody read this whole post, and decided it was racist. She says that “The truth of the matter is that if you or Cass Irvin had been rolling along the fictional street described in the reading looking for a bathroom, as white people you would have been allowed to use one. As people in wheelchairs, you might have had difficulty reaching the bathroom or the toilet itself, but you would not have been excluded by law or custom.” I honestly haven’t the slightest idea what to say to this, but I digress.
Or, not really. When you compare anything you want to left-handedness, you have to worry that people will say you’re downplaying it – after all, not being able to use scissors without immense difficulty isn’t at all the same as, say, not being able to use the bathroom. Unless, of course, you think that an inability to get into the bathroom is a bit of a “difficulty”. Me, I assume that deliberately designing buildings that leave people out (or not providing actual lefty scissors, though I do agree this isn’t on the same level) is excluding people by custom.
So I don’t know. Maybe, to some people, there is no way to trivialize arguments over accessible bathrooms, or cures for everything under the sun, or that kid Zach being locked up by his parents – maybe to some people, anything they don’t want to think about, any time they want to ignore their complicity in something, the issue is automatically trivial.
I know I rambled a lot. I'm sorry. I wanted to say something important to mark the occasion. I don't know if I actually hit on important, but I think I at least managed sincere.
Incidentally, all my google searching scared me. In the process of writing this post, I came across things like this. I'd almost put the nonsense surrounding that article (which I rather liked, linked to, and should find to post up again) out of my mind entirely.
