conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
Clicky

A couple of months ago, my two oldest kids came home from school abuzz over the new game they'd learned in gym class. I'd never heard them express any kind of excitement about P.E. before -- they are not natural athletes -- but there they were strategizing and recounting the high points of their respective matches with unprecedented zeal. I tried to follow the discussion, but it was making little sense to me. My one foray into organized sports was a single spring on the Brookwell Cleaners Softball Team in 6th grade. I remember very little about the season other than the ache in my shoulder from holding my hand above my head in a futile attempt to distract the gnats from my face, the sound of my own teammates' jeers as I made my regular strikeout, and the euphoria of being allowed to take the bench whenever our team had the slightest chance of winning.

The game my kids were so agog over wasn't softball, though. It wasn't even foursquare, a game they'd once tried to explain to me without much success. Finally, I asked them what they were talking about.

"Dodgeball!" my 7-year-old son announced, gleefully. "It's really fun."

Dodgeball? My children were playing dodgeball? That cruel, brutal, violent schoolyard game so mercilessly satirized in the 2004 film with Ben Stiller? The game, more important, that exemplified everything that was wrong with my childhood in suburban New Jersey, a short, pasty-faced Jewish girl in a town full of scrubbed, blond, athletic WASPs, their long tanned limbs toned from years of tennis lessons and country club swim teams? Dodgeball? Over my dead body.

I know it's fashionable to claim to have been a nerd as a child, to insist on having scrabbled to hold on to the lowest tier of the social ladder, to recount years of torture at the hands of the golden and anointed. Trust me, I know just how trite my history of exclusion is. I know that when compared to a lifetime of true deprivation and abuse, suburban misery counts for little. Nonetheless, as someone who still, at 40, gets a clutch of nausea every time she drives by George Washington Junior High School, I am just not willing to let go of the reins of this particular hobbyhorse. I am convinced that my entire personality was formed in those long tile hallways where I was a victim of that most banal of childhood torments -- ostracism. Everything can be explained by, every torque and twist in my character can be attributed to, those grim, lonely years. Neither the jocks, nor the heads, not even the brains wanted any part of me. The other kids didn't talk to me, or even look at me, and if it weren't for the series of successively more hostile prank phone calls that I received, I could have happily deluded myself into thinking that none of them knew I existed.

Gym class, however, was where they allowed themselves to express their disdain. In gym class for some reason they were allowed to heap derision on the apraxic kids. ("No batter, no batter. Easy out.") Gym class was, of course, where the strongest, best-looking kids were made captains and chose us spazzes last. More important, it was where the figures of supposed authority allowed them to do so. Forget the work our parents did molding our minds and values. Everything fell apart as soon as we put on those maroon polyester gym suits.

And dodgeball. God, dodgeball. As my own children were planning their tactics, evaluating which kids would be easily taken out by a hail of red balls (considerations included general athletic ability, low vs. high center of gravity, established cowardice in the face of hard throws) I was rocketed back to those dreaded days on the blacktop at G.W. Jr. High. I remember quaking under the gaze of a huge, blond girl who even then I knew was destined to remember eighth grade as the apogee of her life. She smiles, heaves back her strong arm, and wails the ball. Before it even begins its arc through the air I'm on the ground, quivering, arms over my head, already crying even though I haven't been hit yet.

"I'm calling your gym teacher," I announced.

My children stared at me, mouths agape.

"What are you talking about?" my 10-year-old daughter said.

"You can't play dodgeball. It's cruel."

"It is not," wailed my son.

"Yes it is," I said. "It's mean! It's mean to pick on a kid because she's weak, because she can't catch a ball, or duck, or run fast enough."

The children looked at each other and then at me. Clearly, the more barbaric aspects of the game had not even penetrated their consciousness.

"Mom," my daughter said. "Please, Mom. Do not call our gym teacher. Please."

But it was too late. I was already marshaling my facts. The National Association for Sport & Physical Education has issued a position paper on dodgeball, and they don't like it any more than I do. Dodgeball is not an appropriate activity for K-12 school physical education programs, says the NASPE. A game that targets and eliminates weaker kids does not help them develop confidence. While it may allow for the practice of some physical skills, there are many other activities that do this better, without using human targets. Furthermore, the only children who like dodgeball are the children who don't get hit, who don't get eliminated, who don't get wailed on. Like, for some reason, my children.

I prepared for my conversation with my children's gym teacher by learning by heart the following statement from the NASPE. "It is not appropriate to teach our children that you win by hurting others." Then I made the call. My children go to a remarkable school where community service is an actual part of the curriculum. It made no sense for dodgeball to exist there. This is a school where conflict resolution is taken so seriously that when some neighborhood toughs threw eggs at the fourth graders, the head of the lower school brought them in for a mediated encounter session. This is a school that takes very seriously the theories of Vivian Gussin Paley, author of the marvelous book on childhood social ostracism "You Can't Say You Can't Play." I chose this school precisely because it is the polar opposite of G.W. Jr. High. The gym teacher and the head of the lower school called me back, not a little confused, especially when I explained that, while my children were enjoying themselves tremendously playing dodgeball, and that I didn't actually know of any kids who weren't, I still thought they should ban the game.

It was only while I was earnestly describing to the head of the lower school how detrimental dodgeball was to our children's developing bodies and minds, through the prism, I might add, of my experience huddling with my hands over my 11-year-old head while dozens of balls rained down on me, that I realized that what I was really trying to do was exorcise the ghosts of my own unhappy childhood. I was stirring up trouble at my children's school because 25 years ago I was miserable, and I had decided dodgeball was the very matrix of that misery, in which all the lines of force that were conspiring to crush my spirit were laid bare.

The thing is, my fantasies about being a parent always involved fighting for my unpopular child, doing for her what my own parents couldn't do for me when I was a girl. I am so ready to be that little girl's mother. I know just how to provide the proper sympathy, exactly what to say when the boys call out, "Hey, carpenter's dream!" (flat as a board, and easy to screw), or when you find a page in a slam book dedicated to you. My mother, as supportive and loving as she is, was always left somewhat befuddled and at a loss by my sufferings. "But I always had so many friends when I was a girl!" she used to say. Now that it's my turn to be the mom, maybe I overcompensate. I regale my children with tales of how I used to eat my lunch huddled over a book in a corner of the school library because no one would let me sit at their lunch table. I comfort them with stories about geeks and nerds who went on to conquer the world.

There's only one problem. My children are nothing like me, and they can never quite figure out why I'm laying it on so thick. They aren't living out my childhood, they're living their own. Whatever problems they might have, and they've got plenty, they're not the same ones I had. Sure, they feel sorry for me, or the me that I once was, but they don't really get it. My oldest daughter is supremely confident, secure in her position in her class and with her friends. She's always been popular. She was the queen bee of Gymboree. My son doesn't have her social ease, but neither does he have quite my awkwardness.

And he loves dodgeball.

Halfway through the dodgeball wars, I dropped the ball. On purpose. Whatever I think of the pedagogical value of the game, the fact is my children are happy. They like school, they like gym class. What they don't like is their mother working out her adolescent traumas by berating their gym teacher.

There are times as a parent when you realize that your job is not to be the parent you always imagined you'd be, the parent you always wished you had. Your job is to be the parent your child needs, given the particulars of his or her own life and nature. It's hard to separate your remembered childhood and its emotional legacy from the childhoods that are being lived out in your house, by your children. If you're lucky, your kids will help you make that distinction. They'll look at you, stricken, and beg you not to harangue the coach, not to harass the mother of the boy who didn't invite them to the birthday party, not to intervene to rescind the lousy trade of Yu-Gi-Oh cards they made. You want to protect them, but sometimes what you have to protect them from is the ongoing avalanche of your own childhood -- crashing down on you like a hail of dodgeballs.

Edit: Everyone calm down. I know, you're upset, and you have your reasons and good arguments. But it's frankly a bit scary at how quickly the discussion is escalating along.

Date: 2005-06-08 06:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com
I try my best for you ;0)

Stuck-in-the-mud is quite like tig. The person who is 'on' (or people if you have a larger group) run around trying to tig the others, but the 'on'ness doesn't get transferred. When you get tigged you have to stand still with your arms and legs spread (because you're stuck in the mud) until someone else comes and either ducks under your outstretched arm or crawls under your legs. Then you're free to run around again.

*Tries to remember the names of other tig-based games* 45 and in, manhunt, kiss-chase (yuck!)... oooh, what's that one where you're safe if you crouch down. Or its opposite, where you're safe if you're stood up.

So many memories :0)

Date: 2005-06-08 06:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com
I think we might sometimes have just had to be tigged by someone else. Three degrees I suppose - stuck-in-the-mud light would be being tigged by someone else, medium would be ducking under the arm and hardcore would be crawling between their legs. I never liked the legs one so much, although I think it was more for the vague discomfort of having to crawl between someone's legs (or have someone crawl between mine) rather than the more common sense argument - that it's very easy to get caught yourself whilst you're crawling ;0)

I don't really remember how we decided when a game was over. I have a vague feeling that the last two people not stuck were the next two people on.

Whilst writing that I suddenly wondered how you had referred to being on. You say being it. Which is interesting. I would also say that, as in "you're it" but "Hannah's on" seems very natural too. I wonder, do you have both versions as well?

Date: 2005-06-08 06:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beccak1961.livejournal.com
You're it! yes... Someone is on... not that I've heard.

Date: 2005-06-08 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] rho
We used to play that you couldn't be caught1 when you were crawling underneath someone else's legs to free them. This led to all sorts of hilarious situations whereby there'd be one person stood with arms and legs spread, another having crawled through most of their legs, crouched and ready to run, with a trailing leg still underneath the other person's legs, and two or three people gathered around like hawks, waiting to pounce and tig both people when they made a break for it. And of course, if they were caught, it could mean two people standing like scarecrows right next to each other, just adding an extra person into the mix for the next time the bizarre situation happened. Oh memories.


[1] And that's another thing. Did anyone else have a special word for when you were safe from being caught? For us the word was "borley", but saying this generally tends to get me funny looks from people.

Date: 2005-06-08 04:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ladytalon.livejournal.com
I have never heard "borley," hehe.. so you would get a strange look from me! We just said "safe." I guess we were uncreative.

Date: 2005-06-08 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gingembre.livejournal.com
Did anyone else have a special word for when you were safe from being caught?

In my experience, you were only safe from being caught if you were "on base". That was the only term, and only applied to when you were touching base (if it was an object, lie a tree) or on the designated spot (if base was a space decided on).

Date: 2005-06-08 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com
I was rereading a post from [livejournal.com profile] hp_britglish earlier about various forms of hide-and-seek and one person mentioned barley, a corruption of parlay (parlez) being their word for when someone needed a breather. Could be a similar origin to borley...

Date: 2005-06-08 06:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beccak1961.livejournal.com
I had no idea it was "tig" over there. I learn something new every day :)

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 06:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios