I know nothing about British media...

[conuly]

How reliable is this?

If I'm reading it right, it sounds like they maneuvered Sadaam into a spot where war wouldn't appear to be illegal. Which is... well, wrong, to say the least.

Comments

[cumaeansibyl.livejournal.com]

About the same reliability as the New York Times around here. In other words: very.

[conuly]

Well, the NYTimes *did* have that scandal a summer or two ago.

I'm hoping that this article is somehow wrong. Or... something.

[cumaeansibyl.livejournal.com]

It's not 100% reliable, of course -- see also CBS News -- but the Times papers have been on their best behavior since the thirties, heh. :)

[leora.livejournal.com]

Scary... the article that is.

I don't expect a news source to be 100% reliable, because people work in them. They can be duped sometimes. As long as they're trying to be 100% reliable and tend to be very reliable, that's about as good an information source as you can get. Multiple information sources are better, of course, but a source like that makes a good one to follow.