When I first read this, I thought it said "underpants stain".

Apr. 20th, 2005 08:00 am
conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
  • Current Mood: amused
This is a bit better, but not by much. Especially since one needs a very active imagination to see the supposed image.
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Date: 2005-04-20 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jackshoegazer.livejournal.com
But the real question is: Would people still flock to it and call it a miracle if it WAS an underpants stain?
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324 25 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 07:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios