Why are icons addictive?
Apr. 12th, 2005 01:54 pmYou'd think 50 would be enough for anyone, but now I want more. Maybe 100... Hm. I'm hardly about to reiterate the oh-so-popular suggestion, but any chance, do you think, of people being able to buy ever more icons... *plots and schemes*
Yes, I know, this is pathetic. Sorry. While we're on the subject, why do so many people make icons that all look alike? Is it just that they all decided that they like this one style, so they're only going to make icons in that one style, even though it's virtually impossible to distinguish one from another? And what's with the tiny text? If a person with normal eyesight is unlikely to be able to read the text, don't you think it should be made a little larger? Maybe?
Yes, I know, this is pathetic. Sorry. While we're on the subject, why do so many people make icons that all look alike? Is it just that they all decided that they like this one style, so they're only going to make icons in that one style, even though it's virtually impossible to distinguish one from another? And what's with the tiny text? If a person with normal eyesight is unlikely to be able to read the text, don't you think it should be made a little larger? Maybe?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:16 am (UTC)As to why we do it? I think I have to chalk it up to human nature.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:18 am (UTC)...I need a new icon.
*sez the one with only 3 icons. woe, o woe.*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:43 am (UTC)But it would not be the same as everyone else's style because everyone on LJ having exactly the same blueish muted icons because it's apparently the In thing is ridiculous.
Also, tiny text = fucking stupid. What does it say? A picture is worth a thousand words, why did you choose to make a mess with both?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:56 am (UTC)I was under the impression that the picture part of the icon was the decoration part.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 11:55 am (UTC)Heeheehee! Totally.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 06:58 pm (UTC)I hate unreadable text so much. But not as much as I hate text brushes. Of course, anyone who has ever heard me talk about icons should know this already.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:46 pm (UTC)You know, I found a community for them when I was looking for an example for Uly. I thought that they couldn't get any worse, and then I saw improperly aliased text brushes! (http://www.livejournal.com/community/touchoftext/11040.html). Which just goes to show that one should never think to themselves that it couldn't possibly be worse.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:59 pm (UTC)A sad thing for the world of icons.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:42 pm (UTC)Brushes are things that one can download and use to decorate an icon. In the beginning, icon brushes were used for textures and borders, but lately the big craze has been to take a line from songs, poems, or greeting cards and turn it into a brush. It would kind of be like taking a block of text and making it into a stamp. I HATE icon brushes. They take away the last vestige of originality -- the text content and placement -- from the sheep among the icon makers. I realllly wish they'd never been thought of. It doesn't take THAT much effort to pick a font and a line of text and put it on, and it is one of the areas in which you can exercise the most control and creativity. Icons aren't really all that original to begin with; after all, you're using somebody else's picture, someone else's brushes, and usually someone else's words. It's how you do it that pushes the activity close to being "art," even if it is a kind of bastardized form. Text brushes take away the creativity, and make the process into mass production more than anything. I would even say that they degrade the activity as a whole, even if there are a lot of people who don't use them.
[/rant]
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:43 pm (UTC)Hm, I ramble. That might have made sense, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 11:28 am (UTC)...and I'm on 1600*1200 with a 19" monitor so I have even less chance of reading'em, even the supposedly normal-sized ones. meh.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 01:43 pm (UTC)I don't like icons that look alike. There's this annoying style around...with light blue gradients, unreadable text, all in the same font ((I don't like the font they do those ones is. As much as Comic Sans)) and mainly Harry Potter ((the movies-never the books)) but it's speading to other fandoms. I dislike that style of icon anyway. Or people should try using more different styles. Originality is power, I say. And so if trifle!
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:21 pm (UTC)http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/snowrooster/modernmafia.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/hadria25/CSI/Two/ot3_01.png
There, I went to a random community that allows anyone to post and pulled those out of the first few entries.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-15 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:16 am (UTC)As to why we do it? I think I have to chalk it up to human nature.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:18 am (UTC)...I need a new icon.
*sez the one with only 3 icons. woe, o woe.*
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:43 am (UTC)But it would not be the same as everyone else's style because everyone on LJ having exactly the same blueish muted icons because it's apparently the In thing is ridiculous.
Also, tiny text = fucking stupid. What does it say? A picture is worth a thousand words, why did you choose to make a mess with both?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 10:56 am (UTC)I was under the impression that the picture part of the icon was the decoration part.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 11:55 am (UTC)Heeheehee! Totally.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 06:58 pm (UTC)I hate unreadable text so much. But not as much as I hate text brushes. Of course, anyone who has ever heard me talk about icons should know this already.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:46 pm (UTC)You know, I found a community for them when I was looking for an example for Uly. I thought that they couldn't get any worse, and then I saw improperly aliased text brushes! (http://www.livejournal.com/community/touchoftext/11040.html). Which just goes to show that one should never think to themselves that it couldn't possibly be worse.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:59 pm (UTC)A sad thing for the world of icons.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:42 pm (UTC)Brushes are things that one can download and use to decorate an icon. In the beginning, icon brushes were used for textures and borders, but lately the big craze has been to take a line from songs, poems, or greeting cards and turn it into a brush. It would kind of be like taking a block of text and making it into a stamp. I HATE icon brushes. They take away the last vestige of originality -- the text content and placement -- from the sheep among the icon makers. I realllly wish they'd never been thought of. It doesn't take THAT much effort to pick a font and a line of text and put it on, and it is one of the areas in which you can exercise the most control and creativity. Icons aren't really all that original to begin with; after all, you're using somebody else's picture, someone else's brushes, and usually someone else's words. It's how you do it that pushes the activity close to being "art," even if it is a kind of bastardized form. Text brushes take away the creativity, and make the process into mass production more than anything. I would even say that they degrade the activity as a whole, even if there are a lot of people who don't use them.
[/rant]
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:43 pm (UTC)Hm, I ramble. That might have made sense, though.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 11:28 am (UTC)...and I'm on 1600*1200 with a 19" monitor so I have even less chance of reading'em, even the supposedly normal-sized ones. meh.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 01:43 pm (UTC)I don't like icons that look alike. There's this annoying style around...with light blue gradients, unreadable text, all in the same font ((I don't like the font they do those ones is. As much as Comic Sans)) and mainly Harry Potter ((the movies-never the books)) but it's speading to other fandoms. I dislike that style of icon anyway. Or people should try using more different styles. Originality is power, I say. And so if trifle!
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:21 pm (UTC)http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v665/snowrooster/modernmafia.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y113/hadria25/CSI/Two/ot3_01.png
There, I went to a random community that allows anyone to post and pulled those out of the first few entries.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-15 11:02 pm (UTC)