Let's compare and contrast!
Mar. 14th, 2005 08:20 amSome of these traits are traits of autism and some of them are traits of cancer. Let's see if you can spot the difference!
This is a disease which is marked by excessive growth, aka tumors. Answer: Cancer. Hard to tell, but the word "tumor" gives it away.
This is a neurological difference/disability which is marked by either gaze aversion or staring. Answer: Autism. People with cancer generally will look you in the eye for the appropriate amount of time.
This can develop later in life. Answer: Cancer. It should not be possible to become autistic later in life.
This can kill you. Answer: Cancer. Contrary to popular belief, autism does not snatch children, nor does it kill them.
Congratulations. You now know the difference between autism and cancer. There will be a quiz later.
This is a disease which is marked by excessive growth, aka tumors. Answer: Cancer. Hard to tell, but the word "tumor" gives it away.
This is a neurological difference/disability which is marked by either gaze aversion or staring. Answer: Autism. People with cancer generally will look you in the eye for the appropriate amount of time.
This can develop later in life. Answer: Cancer. It should not be possible to become autistic later in life.
This can kill you. Answer: Cancer. Contrary to popular belief, autism does not snatch children, nor does it kill them.
Congratulations. You now know the difference between autism and cancer. There will be a quiz later.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-14 10:15 am (UTC)What that means in emotional/psychological terms is that autistics feel gaze as a threat or a challenge (or a sexual signal), while NT's are looking at people's faces and doing cognitive tasts like "who is this?" and "what emotions are they displaying?" If you feel stress when looking at a person, then your amygdala is doing something. This may be due to intrinsic neurological differences (inluding but not limited to autism), or second-order "cultural" issues if you've been taught that it's "bad" to look someone in the eye.
Because of the role eye-contact plays in threat/challenge behaviors in mammals, including non-human primates, it seems to me as if the allistic is the one with the neurological irregularity.
no subject
Date: 2005-03-14 12:57 pm (UTC)(And for myself, I think that there's a combination of simply not understanding why one is "meant" to look someone in the eye and what it actually accomplishes, combined with a distinct unease when doing so. This is despite being constnatly taught that eye contact is "good".)
no subject
Date: 2005-03-14 01:10 pm (UTC)Looking at people's faces, especially the eyes, is the sterotypical feature of allism: "marked reliance on the use of multiple nonverbal behaviours such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to express things that could readily be expressed verbally."
It took me years to actually believe that making eye contact was a good thing, and not a challenge behavior.
D'oh!
Date: 2005-03-14 01:56 pm (UTC)