On books.

Feb. 24th, 2005 04:23 pm
conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
I must link to [livejournal.com profile] yonmei's post which directed me to this other post on childhood classics various people just couldn't get into.

Until I do, let me add my bit to the fray:

Some people like to read. Some people don't - maybe it's hard for them, maybe they just prefer to do other things, maybe they never found the engaging story or they were told that what they do like to read (comics, non-fiction, romance) isn't good enough. Out of the people who like to read, sooner or later they'll find a book that they just don't like. And it's not always rational. But there's a number of books I was never able to get into. Cry, the Beloved Country? My entire class hated this. None of us, at Stuy, was able to read enough of it to pass a test. Lord of the Flies? I can never get past the second chapter. I've tried, I just *can't*. Lord of the Rings? Okay, I know why I don't like this, too much description.

It's all right not to like a book. It's also all right to not like a book, and not be able to explain why. Some people don't understand this. They look at a classic, find somebody who doesn't like it, and get upset. HOW COULD YOU NOT LIKE THIS BOOK??? *shrugs* Same way I don't like mushrooms. I. Just. Don't.

It's also all right to like a book, but for stupid reasons. It's got horrible dialog, no plot, gratuitous violence, but you first heard it read by a beloved kindergarten teacher? Great. It's terribly simplistic, presents a black and white view of morality, and has disturbingly sexist undertones (which were fine in its time, but no longer), but when you read it you remember the taste of cookies dipped in milk? Wonderful.

The only thing, as near as I can see, which isn't all right is to dislike a book for stupid reasons. Zel does NOT promote sex before marriage. In fact, the discerning reader can see that she is severely punished for having sex before marriage. Alanna is NOT a slut. She sleeps with no more than three guys in no less than three years. Tom Sawyer isn't all about that filthy N-word, nor is it all about children disobeying the authorities. And censoring the curse words out of a book about censorship? Pathetic.

*stretches*

That's a bit less coherant than I'd like. I'll try to do better next time.

Date: 2005-02-24 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mortaine.livejournal.com
Little Red Riding Hood is hard not depict as violent and quite scary, with Grandma and Red getting eaten. In the non-gruesome version, the wolf gets his head chopped off and Grandma and Red aren't killed by being eaten. But it's still very disturbing.

Date: 2005-02-24 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moggymania.livejournal.com
Actually, in the version I learned, Grandma hides in the closet (or some other excuse for her absence) and the wolf is just chased away -- nobody gets eaten. (I didn't hear more violent versions than that, that I remember, until adulthood.)

Date: 2005-02-24 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mortaine.livejournal.com
Wow. The book I read when I was in the "listen along with the records" stage had grandma getting eaten alive, then Red, then the woodsman comes by, sees what's happened, and chops the wolf's head off with an axe. I think it was the Golden books series.

I'm 30. Maybe they tamed everything down.

Date: 2005-02-24 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
Fairy tales have been progressively tamed down for ages now. One of the things the Grimm brothers did was tame the stories down a little to make them more palatable.

The problem is that fairy tales weren't originally meant for children.

The oldest version of Little Red I know of (and she doesn't even have her trademark color in early versions) involves a strip tease as the girl undresses and item by item the wolf tells her to throw them in the fire as she won't need them again. And it involves the wolf serving her her grandmother's blood and flesh as wine and meat. She eats them.

Date: 2005-02-24 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leora.livejournal.com
Oops, forgot to say... but I like the older version, because she rescues herself and runs away. She's one of only two fairy tale women that I encountered on my own that rescue anyone. And Gretel only does anything helpful after her brother is locked up and out of the way. Little Red is truly resourceful.

There is another fairy tale female who saves the day, but I tend to forget the story as I haven't read it. It just has been mentioned when I discussed how rare females who can do anything effective to save themselves are in fairy tales with another fairy tale geek.

I am glad Little Red got watered down, but I hate that it morphed from She saves herself to She just gets eaten and that's it to A big, strong man comes in and saves the day. I wish they'd watered down the sex and violence while keeping the self-rescue.

Date: 2005-02-24 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com
I'm 19 and learnt much the same version.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324 25 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 27th, 2025 06:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios