Page Summary
http://users.livejournal.com/_outtonight/ - (no subject)
frogmajick.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eofs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fjorab-teke.livejournal.com - (no subject)
queenmargot.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
queenmargot.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rantinan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
eofs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
rantinan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
firingneurons.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fjorab-teke.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eofs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rantinan.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eofs.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
adiva_calandia - (no subject)
scottrossi.livejournal.com - thats disgusting
innerbrat - (no subject)
innerbrat - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 07:36 pm (UTC)What a compassionate guy. /sarcasm
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 07:48 pm (UTC)I guess if this thing passes, I'l have one more reason not to move to any of the nice towns "just across the border."
*plans to post this in childfree_life*
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:02 pm (UTC)What exactly is the point of this? I mean, my mind is trying to make some anti-choice connection in my head, but it's not really making any sense.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:14 pm (UTC)Sersiously, that is the first thing that came into my head reading this. What we have here is a repressed republican transexual who is determined to punish anything with a womb because he cant have one and still hold true to his religeous crap.
Then another thread of personality just kicked up the phrase "legalising the madonna-whore complex"
Either way this is something so far beyond belief that i can bairly comprehend it. In Australia this would be so far beyond legal it's.......
*brain goes gonk trying to come up with good metaphor*
Revolution time.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:20 pm (UTC)Read down the comments - in Virginia you can now get a birth certificate for a stillborn.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:31 pm (UTC)FYI we dont havethe right to remain suilent. we have the right not to comment on anythign else, but must identify ourself to police if asked. :)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:32 pm (UTC)Thankfully, with my pills, any "product of conception" would be SO tiny and so unnoticeable...and not have nerve-endings yet...for me to be obligated to it anyway just because there's no way I could know. It wouldn't even have a chance to implant, so technically it couldn't be termed a miscarriage since it's not a pregnancy.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:32 pm (UTC)I kinda see it as a certificate of life, the opposite of a death certificate. And I dunno, it just makes me feel a little uneasy. Maybe I'm being bothered by nothing. (I can't work out whether it includes miscarriage, or if it's just stillborn - the former worries me more.)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 10:55 pm (UTC)*takes a few deep breath* Mister Law-maker, if you have an issue with babies being abandoned by their mothers -- which I will happily acknowledge as a problem -- why not set up a system like they have in, what is it, California? And Texas, for God's sake? Here, from the Nov. 2002 Reader's Digest:
A young El Monte, CA, woman dropped her healthy newborn at an emergency room entrance and disappeared. "People were outraged that a mother could abandon her baby like that," recalls [Debi] Faris, "and I was outraged they didn't see that she had cared enough to leave her child in a safe place." Faris called a local TV news reporter and asked why police were pursuing the El Monte woman, who had done the right thing. "I'm sorry, Ms. Faris," the reporter responded. "That's the law."
[Faris] learned that Texas had already passed a safe-haven law, and other states were introducing such bills. Babies can now be surrendered, and the mothers won't be persecuted for it.
So, Mr. Law-Maker, GET A CLUE. God. . . . And my red badge of courage arrived today, too.
thats disgusting
Date: 2005-01-06 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:26 am (UTC)*shrug*
It's the Magic Moment, isn't it? After that point, it's a human being, before that it isn't, because, you know, it can't possibly be a gradual process, can it.
(deleted the last comment because it wasn't supposed to be a reply to eofs)
no subject
Date: 2005-01-07 01:27 am (UTC)