Yes, I did want to wake up and find out

[conuly]

that the world is just a smidge more dystopian than it was last week.

I look forward to living in this new and improved hellscape!

Comments

[moxie_man]

They say "historical precedent". At the time the bill of rights was adopted we only had muzzle loaders. I wonder how they would rule on a law that only permitted muzzle loader rifles and muzzle loader handguns. Can't get much more historical than that.

[conuly]

Precedent my ass. This weird-ass interpretation of the second amendment is revisionism at its finest - nobody EVER thought it meant "all guns all the time" until the NRA started worrying about going down like tobacco.

[moxie_man]

Oh, I fully agree, thus the quotation marks and yes, I'd love to see a state test it with a ban on all non-muzzle loading guns.

Just like I can't wait to see the Christian jihad twitch as soon as a non-christian religious school demands a voucher per the ruling against the state of Maine earlier this week that their high school voucher program for towns without a high school must also cover religious schools. The schools that challenged the program never applied to be in it, most likely as they wouldn't be able to meet the state's education standards along with the state's non-discrimination requirements.

[pauamma]

Concur. My reaction to that was "Use that ruling to get a madrassa or 3 funded and the SC will 180 faster than you can say Oyez."