Date: 2022-06-24 03:47 pm (UTC)
moxie_man: (Default)
From: [personal profile] moxie_man
They say "historical precedent". At the time the bill of rights was adopted we only had muzzle loaders. I wonder how they would rule on a law that only permitted muzzle loader rifles and muzzle loader handguns. Can't get much more historical than that.

Date: 2022-06-25 11:14 am (UTC)
moxie_man: (Default)
From: [personal profile] moxie_man
Oh, I fully agree, thus the quotation marks and yes, I'd love to see a state test it with a ban on all non-muzzle loading guns.

Just like I can't wait to see the Christian jihad twitch as soon as a non-christian religious school demands a voucher per the ruling against the state of Maine earlier this week that their high school voucher program for towns without a high school must also cover religious schools. The schools that challenged the program never applied to be in it, most likely as they wouldn't be able to meet the state's education standards along with the state's non-discrimination requirements.

Date: 2022-06-25 05:32 pm (UTC)
pauamma: Cartooney crab wearing hot pink and acid green facemask holding drink with straw (Default)
From: [personal profile] pauamma
Concur. My reaction to that was "Use that ruling to get a madrassa or 3 funded and the SC will 180 faster than you can say Oyez."

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
78 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 25th, 2025 08:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios