conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0429/hirsch.php

So, hold on. They're going to give up on banning gay marriage EVERYWHERE, but they're now going to make it impossible to appeal against the DOMA (which means that a marriage in one state need not be recognized in another state if it happens to be between two men or two women)?

Evil. Pure evil. And either terribly short-sighted or maniacally clever. The precedent set is unthinkable. We have a constitutional right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. But if one or two laws like this get passed, how long before that right is diluted to nothingness? Precedent is a powerful thing.

Date: 2004-07-16 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joeymew.livejournal.com
Doesn't Canada seem like a lovely place? I hear it rains a lot on the west coast near the border...

Date: 2004-07-16 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsluvdmb.livejournal.com
Honestly I'm not too worried about that. Not only is the DOMA clearly unconsitutional, the Marriage Whatever Act is also unconstitutional. The members of the Supreme Court may have their feelings on same-sex marriage, but being barred from hearing a case from the whims of the legislative branch will piss them off. That's why we have checks and balances. When one branch oversteps their boundaries, another branch is there to hit them upside the head and remind them to play nice.

Date: 2004-07-16 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firingneurons.livejournal.com
Eh.. Canada isn't that great.. Quebec still hasn't signed the damned constitution!

Date: 2004-07-16 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nerdinium.livejournal.com
Which is why Bush is so desperate to get his nominees into as many courts as possible instead of the Democrats. Then they would have all 3 branches - executive, legislative AND judicial.

World Domination Incorporated.

Date: 2004-07-16 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsluvdmb.livejournal.com
Until November when anything could happen.

Date: 2004-07-17 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firingneurons.livejournal.com
No.. That would be just way too smart.

Date: 2004-07-17 07:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maladaptive.livejournal.com
Unconstitutional as becoming a dictator (which I sometimes feel is his ultimate goal). "This law is invulnerable cos you can't appeal against it! Hahaha!" Uh, right.

Date: 2004-07-17 08:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsluvdmb.livejournal.com
Hmm... you know, that's not a bad idea...

Date: 2004-07-16 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joeymew.livejournal.com
Doesn't Canada seem like a lovely place? I hear it rains a lot on the west coast near the border...

Date: 2004-07-16 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsluvdmb.livejournal.com
Honestly I'm not too worried about that. Not only is the DOMA clearly unconsitutional, the Marriage Whatever Act is also unconstitutional. The members of the Supreme Court may have their feelings on same-sex marriage, but being barred from hearing a case from the whims of the legislative branch will piss them off. That's why we have checks and balances. When one branch oversteps their boundaries, another branch is there to hit them upside the head and remind them to play nice.

Date: 2004-07-16 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firingneurons.livejournal.com
Eh.. Canada isn't that great.. Quebec still hasn't signed the damned constitution!

Date: 2004-07-16 10:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nerdinium.livejournal.com
Which is why Bush is so desperate to get his nominees into as many courts as possible instead of the Democrats. Then they would have all 3 branches - executive, legislative AND judicial.

World Domination Incorporated.

Date: 2004-07-16 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsluvdmb.livejournal.com
Until November when anything could happen.

Date: 2004-07-17 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firingneurons.livejournal.com
No.. That would be just way too smart.

Date: 2004-07-17 07:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maladaptive.livejournal.com
Unconstitutional as becoming a dictator (which I sometimes feel is his ultimate goal). "This law is invulnerable cos you can't appeal against it! Hahaha!" Uh, right.

Date: 2004-07-17 08:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catsluvdmb.livejournal.com
Hmm... you know, that's not a bad idea...

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 1617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 05:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios