conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
Breast milk compound shrinks warts.

Breast milk apparently tastes good with chocolate syrup (scroll down) No answer on how it tastes with ancient cereals.....

If Michael Moore is to be believed, it is apparently considered a potential threat to aviation.

And all mammals can secrete milk of some sort. Boobs... is there anything they can't do?

While we're on the topic, why is it that guys can go around topless if we can't? Doesn't that count as blatant hypocrisy, not to mention stupidity? I mean, I *barely* accept the convention of clothing-in-the-summer anyway, because I know that most people don't have my accepting view towards nudity, but....

Date: 2004-06-25 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] demonkoala.livejournal.com
Clothes=civilized
Or so society says. I've always wondered what's the point of clothes during the summer in some places. It's really hot, And clothes don't exactly helpd.

Date: 2004-06-25 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] demonkoala.livejournal.com
I don't know. I'm not the philosopher of might and magic. I just say what I know :P

Date: 2004-06-25 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firingneurons.livejournal.com
Clothes are possibly the dumbest thing invented! They cause tons of problems, class division, teasing of you don't have the 'right' kind, bah, we'd all be better off without clothing!

I'm also glad that I'm not the only one who thinks that it's really unfair that guys can go topless but girls can't!

Date: 2004-06-25 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meteorie.livejournal.com
My world history teacher had mentioned a few months ago that there were some women sueing for the right to go topless.. I don't know what happened with that, though.

Date: 2004-06-25 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaumaturge.livejournal.com
While we're on the topic, why is it that guys can go around topless if we can't?

Well, you can in Ontario, at least. "All areas of Ontario, unless otherwise specified by town or city by-laws, allow both males and females to be topless in public." (source (http://www.campusprogram.com/reference/en/wikipedia/n/nu/nudism.html))

Even though not too many people do, and a bit of a stir was caused when that particular ruling was made, it has been upheld. Although there are people who actively fight against it (http://www.realwomenca.com/newsletter/1998_Mar_April/article_10.html). In the name of the children, of course.

Date: 2004-06-28 11:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaumaturge.livejournal.com
Well, to be reasonable, 'harm' is a rather relative term in this context.

"If Michael Moore is to be believed..."

Date: 2004-06-25 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marveen.livejournal.com
BWAHAHAHAHA!!

I mean, really. *snort, guffaw*

Isn't this the same individual who was discovered to have lied about marketing/distribution purely for publicity?

If he said the sky was blue I'd look out the window to check.

(No, I'm not an ardent Limbaugh fan either. I support the Limbaugh/Moore deathmatch idea, actually.)

Re: "If Michael Moore is to be believed..."

Date: 2004-06-25 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainbow-goddess.livejournal.com
Michael Moore didn't come up with the "breast milk is a threat" thing. I've read a few stories in the past 2 1/2 years of women being forced to sample expressed breast milk before being allowed to take it on a plane, in the name of "security." If you don't believe Michael Moore, do a Google search on it.

Re: "If Michael Moore is to be believed..."

Date: 2004-06-25 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marveen.livejournal.com
I was just pointing out the irony of the phrase when applied to someone who has admitted to lying for no more reason than pity-publicity seeking.

I can well believe the breastmilk facet of the airport insanity.

Date: 2004-06-28 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stejcruetekie.livejournal.com
ah, I knew you'd have some interesting posts waiting when I got back!

Wanna go to a nudist beach sometime? I hear there's at least a topless one somewhere in LI :)

Date: 2004-06-25 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] demonkoala.livejournal.com
Clothes=civilized
Or so society says. I've always wondered what's the point of clothes during the summer in some places. It's really hot, And clothes don't exactly helpd.

Date: 2004-06-25 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] demonkoala.livejournal.com
I don't know. I'm not the philosopher of might and magic. I just say what I know :P

Date: 2004-06-25 11:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firingneurons.livejournal.com
Clothes are possibly the dumbest thing invented! They cause tons of problems, class division, teasing of you don't have the 'right' kind, bah, we'd all be better off without clothing!

I'm also glad that I'm not the only one who thinks that it's really unfair that guys can go topless but girls can't!

Date: 2004-06-25 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meteorie.livejournal.com
My world history teacher had mentioned a few months ago that there were some women sueing for the right to go topless.. I don't know what happened with that, though.

Date: 2004-06-25 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaumaturge.livejournal.com
While we're on the topic, why is it that guys can go around topless if we can't?

Well, you can in Ontario, at least. "All areas of Ontario, unless otherwise specified by town or city by-laws, allow both males and females to be topless in public." (source (http://www.campusprogram.com/reference/en/wikipedia/n/nu/nudism.html))

Even though not too many people do, and a bit of a stir was caused when that particular ruling was made, it has been upheld. Although there are people who actively fight against it (http://www.realwomenca.com/newsletter/1998_Mar_April/article_10.html). In the name of the children, of course.

Date: 2004-06-28 11:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaumaturge.livejournal.com
Well, to be reasonable, 'harm' is a rather relative term in this context.

"If Michael Moore is to be believed..."

Date: 2004-06-25 12:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marveen.livejournal.com
BWAHAHAHAHA!!

I mean, really. *snort, guffaw*

Isn't this the same individual who was discovered to have lied about marketing/distribution purely for publicity?

If he said the sky was blue I'd look out the window to check.

(No, I'm not an ardent Limbaugh fan either. I support the Limbaugh/Moore deathmatch idea, actually.)

Re: "If Michael Moore is to be believed..."

Date: 2004-06-25 06:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rainbow-goddess.livejournal.com
Michael Moore didn't come up with the "breast milk is a threat" thing. I've read a few stories in the past 2 1/2 years of women being forced to sample expressed breast milk before being allowed to take it on a plane, in the name of "security." If you don't believe Michael Moore, do a Google search on it.

Re: "If Michael Moore is to be believed..."

Date: 2004-06-25 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marveen.livejournal.com
I was just pointing out the irony of the phrase when applied to someone who has admitted to lying for no more reason than pity-publicity seeking.

I can well believe the breastmilk facet of the airport insanity.

Date: 2004-06-28 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stejcruetekie.livejournal.com
ah, I knew you'd have some interesting posts waiting when I got back!

Wanna go to a nudist beach sometime? I hear there's at least a topless one somewhere in LI :)

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 1617
18 1920 21222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 11:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios