conuly: (Default)
[personal profile] conuly
http://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2013/05/vocabulary-size

They now have results!

Interesting thing here. At the end of the article, the author mock-complains that everybody bragged last article about their purported vocabulary size, ignoring the warning that it is "naff" to do so. Definitely his word, I'm pretty sure I only learned it in the last few minutes. One commenter jokingly (?) suggested that maybe they ignored the warning because "naff" isn't in their vocabulary!

It's the sort of comment you see all the time, that a book or movie uses words the commenter "doesn't know". Do people really not teach students to wiggle out the meaning of a word via context anymore? I see that all the time, and I *know* that is a skill we were explicitly taught!

(Then again, we were also explicitly taught that c always and only makes the s sound in front of the letters e, i, and y, and yet if you look up any information about phonics instruction you'll find page after page of people saying they only learned that rule as an adult, and now they're a convert on the subject. I find that a nifty way to sort out who had only whole word instruction as a child. Point is, sometimes people aren't taught basic information when they should be. That's not their fault.)

Date: 2013-05-30 03:22 pm (UTC)
janewilliams20: (Default)
From: [personal profile] janewilliams20
I was taught to work words out from context, and for fantasy/SF fiction, it's essential - some of the words will only exist in the context of that book! I see the survey results find that people who read fiction have larger vocabularies, so maybe that's a correlation?

I was also taught to use a dictionary. One of the parents telling me to use a dictionary would then lift it down from the shelf for me, as the Shorter OED is rather heavy when you're only 5 :)

Not sure if "naff" is in there. I'll check tonight.

Date: 2013-05-30 04:28 pm (UTC)
janewilliams20: (Default)
From: [personal profile] janewilliams20
Yes, I think this was an "if you can't work it out" rather than the first step.

Oh, and I just checked. My hard-copy SOED (25 years old, wedding present) does not contain "naff".

Date: 2013-05-31 12:07 am (UTC)
phoenix: (book)
From: [personal profile] phoenix
It's fairly recent British slang (from Polari) - the OED's earliest usage for it is 1966, so I guess it's not too surprising it's not in an older SOED. I don't hear it here in Ireland but I know a few English people who use it.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 6 78 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 1617
18 1920 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 3031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 09:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios