Apr. 13th, 2009

conuly: (Default)
Amazon sales rankings are often used as conditions in author contracts and my independent bookstores to help make purchasing decisions.

If it is, I suppose it makes a sad kind of sense, but shouldn't there be some sort of independent company to work out how likely a book is to sell? This strikes me as a stunningly bad idea for reasons quite beyond the current drama.

Also? A post on metadata and the whole... fail.

Also ALSO? Look at this. Don't mess with teh internetz. CLEARLY.
conuly: (Default)
Look at this! Isn't it just the cutest darn thing you have ever seen? I just wanna hug it and love it and send it gently where it's supposed to go! Aw!
conuly: (big damn hero)
UPDATE

There has been one (ONE) reply on the subject.

“This is an embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloging error for a company that prides itself on offering complete selection.

“It has been misreported that the issue was limited to Gay & Lesbian themed titles – in fact, it impacted 57,310 books in a number of broad categories such as Health, Mind & Body, Reproductive & Sexual Medicine, and Erotica. This problem impacted books not just in the United States but globally. It affected not just sales rank but also had the effect of removing the books from Amazon’s main product search.

“Many books have now been fixed and we’re in the process of fixing the remainder as quickly as possible, and we intend to implement new measures to make this kind of accident less likely to occur in the future.”


That's... not exactly a public apology, now is it. And notice how she's trying to distance it from the Gay thing. Correct or not, there was a reason the delisted books were delisted. Why did this happen? Errors don't come out of the ether, do they? (Do they?)


This is a pretty thoughtful post I can't quite classify, by [livejournal.com profile] leora.

And here's a pretty thought-provoking one, "Amazonfail & The Cost of Freedom". Seriously, be sure to read that one. Taken from [livejournal.com profile] carlanime
conuly: (cucumber)
But here's an interview with a former Amazon employee.

More interesting is that everyone in publishing entrusts their rankings and status to a single provider. That's the story no one likes thinking about in publishing.

And I don't think anybody outside of publishing knows about it, do they? Because today is the first I've heard of it. (If anybody has information contradicting or confirming, tell me, please.)

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5 6 7 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 06:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios