Browsing amazon reviews. I shouldn't.
Here's a woman who comments about a picture book that "I wish my 4th grade geography teacher would have used that one". It's not standard, but I do aim to be descriptive and not prescriptive, I really do.
What's funny about this is that not two reviews earlier she said this about another picture book on the Nativity: I love the idea of this book but it was not edited properly. "These are the shepherds watching by night that saw the star in the sky (should be who saw the star...)" " This is the child that (should be who) was born."
She counts this as a major flaw, along with the use of the word "ass" (which I assume refers to the animal...?), and rates the book as only two stars.
And yet, in my internal ranking of grammatical "errors" I would call replacing "who" with "that" far less significant than replacing "wish she had" with "wish she would have"! But I wouldn't rate a book down for this one way or another. I just think it's funny.
(Also? Another reviewer? I appreciate that you never ever ever ever ever want your child to hear the word "ain't". Got it. But it's not necessary to give a one star review on a book for that, particularly when the book's title includes the word "ain't". We can all see it, and if that's our criteria for judging picture books we really can figure it out without your condescending "help", thank you very much!)
Here's a woman who comments about a picture book that "I wish my 4th grade geography teacher would have used that one". It's not standard, but I do aim to be descriptive and not prescriptive, I really do.
What's funny about this is that not two reviews earlier she said this about another picture book on the Nativity: I love the idea of this book but it was not edited properly. "These are the shepherds watching by night that saw the star in the sky (should be who saw the star...)" " This is the child that (should be who) was born."
She counts this as a major flaw, along with the use of the word "ass" (which I assume refers to the animal...?), and rates the book as only two stars.
And yet, in my internal ranking of grammatical "errors" I would call replacing "who" with "that" far less significant than replacing "wish she had" with "wish she would have"! But I wouldn't rate a book down for this one way or another. I just think it's funny.
(Also? Another reviewer? I appreciate that you never ever ever ever ever want your child to hear the word "ain't". Got it. But it's not necessary to give a one star review on a book for that, particularly when the book's title includes the word "ain't". We can all see it, and if that's our criteria for judging picture books we really can figure it out without your condescending "help", thank you very much!)