![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I *like* children's books and YA. They're cheaper than grown-up fiction (I'd say adult like the adult I am, but somehow that means explicit and explicit has to do with sex. I hate the euphemism game sometimes!) and just as well-written - oftentimes they're *better* written if only because they're not busy cramming in multiple romantic subplots and gratuitous sex! (I have nothing against a well-written sex scene, mind you, but most of them don't advance the plot very much and are just awkward to read on the train or with my mom in the room.)
There's a trend recently for children's book covers to have silhouettes.
The first few times it was interesting and novel. Now - and it's only been a few years! - it's already tedious and overdone. I thought at first it was one publisher trying to set a new cover style for all their books, which would at least make sense, but a quick search shows me three different publishers for three different books, I stopped looking after that.
I don't get it at all. Why exactly did this become so popular, and when is it going to stop? Or if it isn't going to stop, when are people going to start doing something new with it?
*sighs*
At least the contents of the books are readable. (I need bookcases.)
There's a trend recently for children's book covers to have silhouettes.
The first few times it was interesting and novel. Now - and it's only been a few years! - it's already tedious and overdone. I thought at first it was one publisher trying to set a new cover style for all their books, which would at least make sense, but a quick search shows me three different publishers for three different books, I stopped looking after that.
I don't get it at all. Why exactly did this become so popular, and when is it going to stop? Or if it isn't going to stop, when are people going to start doing something new with it?
*sighs*
At least the contents of the books are readable. (I need bookcases.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-26 03:26 pm (UTC)A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 01:34 pm (UTC)So maybe it's a general trend to allow more people of various ethnic backgrounds to see "themselves" on the cover. And to avoid putting non-white people on the cover and still maintain some semblance of PC-ness. :X I don't know, I try to think of a more charitable explanation, but...
Re: A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 06:22 pm (UTC)Re: A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 06:27 pm (UTC)Re: A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 06:48 pm (UTC)In fact, I saw that same discussion (or another on the same topic) and felt like pointing it out but I was too lazy ultimately to do so.
Re: A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 07:22 pm (UTC)Re: A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 07:29 pm (UTC)Re: A "PC" variant on whitewashing?
Date: 2010-09-26 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-26 02:47 pm (UTC)There are good and bad aspects to this: it makes it easier to find some of what you're looking for, but less likely to wander out of narrow subgenres. (The discussion of this at Farthing Party featured the same person starting by getting annoyed at someone who suggested that this was too narrowing, and ending by encouraging people to take a chance on books that look different. No, we don't just want everything labeled only by title and author, or alphabetically by author within sections for each publisher, but that doesn't mean the current marketing-driven system is ideal. Evolution tends to local optima.)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-26 06:49 pm (UTC)That's a good point.