Saw somebody telling another person that a goldfish might be a good choice for a young kid because "a short lifespan could be a benefit if the kid gets bored in a month."
Let's get this out of the way right now. Goldfish, if properly cared for, live for... not months. Not years. Decades. As in "You get your kid a pet now, and he'll be taking it to college, and showing it to his kids (assuming he has any)".
And they're not "low-maintenance" either (as that person also claimed). If they were low-maintenence, they'd live a lot longer than a month in most people's minds.
I've had my fill of taking care of animals badly. It was a mistake. Now? I don't want to hear of so much as one maltreated fish, do you hear me? If you can't care for them properly, don't bother at all.
And the first step of caring for them properly is doing the research before getting one. Just because popular culture and your next door neighbor tells you that goldfish die fast doesn't mean they actually do. Nor would it mean that they aren't entitled to proper care, even if they *did* happen to have short lifespans. Which they don't.
Let's get this out of the way right now. Goldfish, if properly cared for, live for... not months. Not years. Decades. As in "You get your kid a pet now, and he'll be taking it to college, and showing it to his kids (assuming he has any)".
And they're not "low-maintenance" either (as that person also claimed). If they were low-maintenence, they'd live a lot longer than a month in most people's minds.
I've had my fill of taking care of animals badly. It was a mistake. Now? I don't want to hear of so much as one maltreated fish, do you hear me? If you can't care for them properly, don't bother at all.
And the first step of caring for them properly is doing the research before getting one. Just because popular culture and your next door neighbor tells you that goldfish die fast doesn't mean they actually do. Nor would it mean that they aren't entitled to proper care, even if they *did* happen to have short lifespans. Which they don't.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 02:57 am (UTC)Anyway, isn't getting a pet specifically so that it might die in a month kind of counter-intuitive in a child's pet? Teaching children about death is all well and good, but it seems unnecessarily cruel to put an opportunity like that in your path on purpose.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:48 am (UTC)Unfortunately, goldfish only die "in months" when they're being mistreated.
Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:08 am (UTC)To keep this simple, Im at mermaidnchains@gmail.com so we can exchange email there if you like. I also, but rarely, am on yahoo chat under the same name (mermaidnchains@yahoo.com).
I apriciate you taking the time to give me a heads up on what you liked. Thanks so much for volunteering!
~Lynn
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:14 am (UTC)I can't give advice unless I have a question to answer (I mean, I can, but I might talk all about the wrong thing!), so email me first with whatever seems relevant, and I'll do my best. Even if I don't know the answer, I can send you to the people who do. My email is conuly AT livejournal DOT com.
Or you can ask me here - it's not hijacking, promise :)
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 04:54 am (UTC)For the record, Im a very busty woman, and the idea of some of those side slings seems dangerous - like Id smother a poor little one under a breast or something. No, I dont intend to breastfeed (medications I take would be bad).
Looking at those slings, it seems that they are either hard to put on, or difficult to move with the baby (all up in your face or - again - under my breast and smothered).
So, any suggestions, info you have would be wonderful!
Just as a side note, Im 5 months along, and just found out, so Im rushing to catch up on all the newest baby info out there. :)
Thanks again!
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 05:34 am (UTC)Wait. Before I do that, let me point out these links on "Plus sized baby wearing". I'm assuming that by "plus sized" they also mean "with accompanying bustage", so they should be helpful: One and two.
I've used three types of slings (not counting "ye old sheet trick"). I've used a ring sling, a mei-tai (mine looks better than this, I think), and a pair of kangas.
I wouldn't reccommend a kanga to you. They're pretty short, and they're not all that versatile. I like mine, but you can't use a lot of carrying positions, and for a newborn, that's not so good. No lying down. However, a kanga is a very short wrap, much like a rebozo.
So that leaves you with the mei-tai and the ring-sling. I *think* a ring-sling is what you mean when you say "side sling", right? If that's the case, there *may* be a way around that - a carrying position that won't increase the smothering risk. For example, it looks like the "vertical carry" here would have no smothering risk - but it's also not the most secure hold out there. You'd want to keep a hand on the baby with this hold, though you wouldn't be carrying their weight in your arm. I didn't get much use out of the ring sling, but the more research I do, the more I think that the brand of sling my sister had was just not very well-designed.
Alternatively, you might want to wait until the baby has good head control and can sit up a bit, and then move directly to back or hip carries. I showed you I use a mei-tai (on the front), those are easy to use on the back, though I find it uncomfortable on the side. Or a short wrap (like the rebozo I mentioned) or even a longer one can be used on the hip (no link here - I'll find one later if you need it).
If that's the only safety concern you've got, I hope I've helped. If you have more, you can ask me. Or you can ask here - they seem to know quite a bit, and to be pretty helpful.
If you don't mind me saying this so bluntly (and I hope not, I don't know another way to say it), I'm a bit concerned on another issue about the medication. I'm under the impression that if it's safe for pregnancy, it's safe for breastfeeding. Since I'm assuming you're not taking medication that's very unsafe for pregnancy, I'm wondering if you've considered all your options here. (This is, believe it or not, not an attack. It's just that if you're going "I wish I could nurse, but I can't" and really *do* wish you could nurse, from what I know, it may be possible that you can. And safely. Giving up needed medication is obviously unsafe, and I wouldn't suggest it if you paid me.) But it's not an issue I'm all that knowledgeable in, so I could be pretty wrong. Since you said you just found out, it occurs to me that you might actually not know this yet, though, and might not have done research into this yet.
I'm sorry this is so long! (And then off-topic at the end, which did seem rude, and unsolicited, but if it's something you want to do but think you can't, I suppose that's no problem.)
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:41 pm (UTC)Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:43 pm (UTC)Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:47 pm (UTC)Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:45 am (UTC)I understand the desire for a pet that, to be frank, dies fast. But I don't want a pet to die fast because it's being benevolently mistreated! Better to die fast because they just don't live very long.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:56 am (UTC)They don't realize that the natural lifespan of a hamster (which the kid would probably enjoy more) is shorter than that of a goldfish.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-03 01:56 am (UTC)I take the kids to the pet store to LOOK at the animals, but I wouldn't get them a pet until they were much older. (well, we have cats and a dog now anyways). Maybe ummm age 18. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-03 02:07 am (UTC)Too many of my friends have non-standard pets.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 11:08 am (UTC)A dog will live for a month if you look after it poorly too :/
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-03 12:17 am (UTC)Then I did the research... difficult care and you have to have at least two. They are miserable and die if alone with no others of their kind.
Not really well-suited to my needs for a pet. That's why if I do get a pet, I'm considering a chinchilla. Not as cute or soft, but still a sweet creature, and they're lower maintenance and hardy. They have finicky diets, but not that difficult. You basically have to just avoid giving them too many treats. And the females aren't prone to anything that looks too difficult. A much better fit.
I'm all for research. And even once you figured out the species you want, research the breeds if it's relevant. Research++
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 02:57 am (UTC)Anyway, isn't getting a pet specifically so that it might die in a month kind of counter-intuitive in a child's pet? Teaching children about death is all well and good, but it seems unnecessarily cruel to put an opportunity like that in your path on purpose.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:48 am (UTC)Unfortunately, goldfish only die "in months" when they're being mistreated.
Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:08 am (UTC)To keep this simple, Im at mermaidnchains@gmail.com so we can exchange email there if you like. I also, but rarely, am on yahoo chat under the same name (mermaidnchains@yahoo.com).
I apriciate you taking the time to give me a heads up on what you liked. Thanks so much for volunteering!
~Lynn
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:14 am (UTC)I can't give advice unless I have a question to answer (I mean, I can, but I might talk all about the wrong thing!), so email me first with whatever seems relevant, and I'll do my best. Even if I don't know the answer, I can send you to the people who do. My email is conuly AT livejournal DOT com.
Or you can ask me here - it's not hijacking, promise :)
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 04:54 am (UTC)For the record, Im a very busty woman, and the idea of some of those side slings seems dangerous - like Id smother a poor little one under a breast or something. No, I dont intend to breastfeed (medications I take would be bad).
Looking at those slings, it seems that they are either hard to put on, or difficult to move with the baby (all up in your face or - again - under my breast and smothered).
So, any suggestions, info you have would be wonderful!
Just as a side note, Im 5 months along, and just found out, so Im rushing to catch up on all the newest baby info out there. :)
Thanks again!
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 05:34 am (UTC)Wait. Before I do that, let me point out these links on "Plus sized baby wearing". I'm assuming that by "plus sized" they also mean "with accompanying bustage", so they should be helpful: One and two.
I've used three types of slings (not counting "ye old sheet trick"). I've used a ring sling, a mei-tai (mine looks better than this, I think), and a pair of kangas.
I wouldn't reccommend a kanga to you. They're pretty short, and they're not all that versatile. I like mine, but you can't use a lot of carrying positions, and for a newborn, that's not so good. No lying down. However, a kanga is a very short wrap, much like a rebozo.
So that leaves you with the mei-tai and the ring-sling. I *think* a ring-sling is what you mean when you say "side sling", right? If that's the case, there *may* be a way around that - a carrying position that won't increase the smothering risk. For example, it looks like the "vertical carry" here would have no smothering risk - but it's also not the most secure hold out there. You'd want to keep a hand on the baby with this hold, though you wouldn't be carrying their weight in your arm. I didn't get much use out of the ring sling, but the more research I do, the more I think that the brand of sling my sister had was just not very well-designed.
Alternatively, you might want to wait until the baby has good head control and can sit up a bit, and then move directly to back or hip carries. I showed you I use a mei-tai (on the front), those are easy to use on the back, though I find it uncomfortable on the side. Or a short wrap (like the rebozo I mentioned) or even a longer one can be used on the hip (no link here - I'll find one later if you need it).
If that's the only safety concern you've got, I hope I've helped. If you have more, you can ask me. Or you can ask here - they seem to know quite a bit, and to be pretty helpful.
If you don't mind me saying this so bluntly (and I hope not, I don't know another way to say it), I'm a bit concerned on another issue about the medication. I'm under the impression that if it's safe for pregnancy, it's safe for breastfeeding. Since I'm assuming you're not taking medication that's very unsafe for pregnancy, I'm wondering if you've considered all your options here. (This is, believe it or not, not an attack. It's just that if you're going "I wish I could nurse, but I can't" and really *do* wish you could nurse, from what I know, it may be possible that you can. And safely. Giving up needed medication is obviously unsafe, and I wouldn't suggest it if you paid me.) But it's not an issue I'm all that knowledgeable in, so I could be pretty wrong. Since you said you just found out, it occurs to me that you might actually not know this yet, though, and might not have done research into this yet.
I'm sorry this is so long! (And then off-topic at the end, which did seem rude, and unsolicited, but if it's something you want to do but think you can't, I suppose that's no problem.)
Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:41 pm (UTC)Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:43 pm (UTC)Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 03:47 pm (UTC)Re: Hijacking not allowed!
Date: 2006-09-02 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:45 am (UTC)I understand the desire for a pet that, to be frank, dies fast. But I don't want a pet to die fast because it's being benevolently mistreated! Better to die fast because they just don't live very long.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:56 am (UTC)They don't realize that the natural lifespan of a hamster (which the kid would probably enjoy more) is shorter than that of a goldfish.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-03 01:56 am (UTC)I take the kids to the pet store to LOOK at the animals, but I wouldn't get them a pet until they were much older. (well, we have cats and a dog now anyways). Maybe ummm age 18. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-03 02:07 am (UTC)Too many of my friends have non-standard pets.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 11:08 am (UTC)A dog will live for a month if you look after it poorly too :/
no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-02 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-03 12:17 am (UTC)Then I did the research... difficult care and you have to have at least two. They are miserable and die if alone with no others of their kind.
Not really well-suited to my needs for a pet. That's why if I do get a pet, I'm considering a chinchilla. Not as cute or soft, but still a sweet creature, and they're lower maintenance and hardy. They have finicky diets, but not that difficult. You basically have to just avoid giving them too many treats. And the females aren't prone to anything that looks too difficult. A much better fit.
I'm all for research. And even once you figured out the species you want, research the breeds if it's relevant. Research++