Page Summary
kibbles.livejournal.com - (no subject)
feasel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cumaeansibyl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
cumaeansibyl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arikatt.livejournal.com - (no subject)
masterflare421.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
fascinoma.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fascinoma.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
farraige.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ahsirakh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lakidaa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
celticess.livejournal.com - (no subject)
marveen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
marveen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
sicpuppy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kibbles.livejournal.com - (no subject)
feasel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cumaeansibyl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
cumaeansibyl.livejournal.com - (no subject)
arikatt.livejournal.com - (no subject)
masterflare421.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
fascinoma.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fascinoma.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
farraige.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ahsirakh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lakidaa.livejournal.com - (no subject)
celticess.livejournal.com - (no subject)
marveen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
marveen.livejournal.com - (no subject)
conuly - (no subject)
sicpuppy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Style: Dawn Flush for Compartmentalize by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:49 pm (UTC)But fine then. Why not say "dog crackers"?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:06 am (UTC)Durrrrrr. I really should READ people's LJ entries before I respond.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:08 am (UTC)At least your comment makes sense now... though most cookies *are* sweet instead of savory over here.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:09 am (UTC)No, they have biscuits too. They call 'em scones. And they're not really biscuits, just kinda like biscuits.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 04:07 am (UTC)... sorry.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 10:27 am (UTC)because, y'know, they're shaped like bones.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 12:11 pm (UTC)Some britt spellings though are interesting. I wonder if australians use some of them. Canadians use some english, french, and american spellings. But it didn't dawn on me how different somethings are spelled til my ex boyfriend spelt tire one day as tyre.(He also got in an argument with me over how we say volkswagon here until I pointed at a commercial and said "see told you so")
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 07:20 pm (UTC)Anyway, those dog treats are a lot like biscotti, which are (as we all know) a type of cookie.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 10:42 am (UTC)Scones are completely unrelated to biscuits here. They're sort of doughy cakey things with raisins in them that little old women like to have with tea and cream. Kinda fall more into the category of cake than biscuit.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:49 pm (UTC)But fine then. Why not say "dog crackers"?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-12 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:06 am (UTC)Durrrrrr. I really should READ people's LJ entries before I respond.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:08 am (UTC)At least your comment makes sense now... though most cookies *are* sweet instead of savory over here.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 01:09 am (UTC)No, they have biscuits too. They call 'em scones. And they're not really biscuits, just kinda like biscuits.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 04:07 am (UTC)... sorry.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 10:27 am (UTC)because, y'know, they're shaped like bones.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 12:11 pm (UTC)Some britt spellings though are interesting. I wonder if australians use some of them. Canadians use some english, french, and american spellings. But it didn't dawn on me how different somethings are spelled til my ex boyfriend spelt tire one day as tyre.(He also got in an argument with me over how we say volkswagon here until I pointed at a commercial and said "see told you so")
no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-13 07:20 pm (UTC)Anyway, those dog treats are a lot like biscotti, which are (as we all know) a type of cookie.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-14 10:42 am (UTC)Scones are completely unrelated to biscuits here. They're sort of doughy cakey things with raisins in them that little old women like to have with tea and cream. Kinda fall more into the category of cake than biscuit.