![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/06/nyregion/06hitler.html
( Read more... )
This is probably for the best. I mean, Adolf Hitler is bad enough, but who names their precious baby "Honzlynn"? Seriously? (Joking aside, this still probably is for the best, if what I recall from earlier articles is accurate and correct.)
But with that said, I sure hope there's more to the ruling than that. I would hate to think that these children really were taken (and kept!) from their parents for nothing more than shitty names, unemployment, and the fact that the parents were abused as children. That's not actually the way the system is supposed to work.
( Read more... )
This is probably for the best. I mean, Adolf Hitler is bad enough, but who names their precious baby "Honzlynn"? Seriously? (Joking aside, this still probably is for the best, if what I recall from earlier articles is accurate and correct.)
But with that said, I sure hope there's more to the ruling than that. I would hate to think that these children really were taken (and kept!) from their parents for nothing more than shitty names, unemployment, and the fact that the parents were abused as children. That's not actually the way the system is supposed to work.
