Quick question....
May. 6th, 2010 12:50 pmLet's say you had to do some math in your head. No calculator or pen and paper, though you could also use your fingers and toes (or other body parts as appropriate. As a kid, I'd count to twelve by closing my eyes!)
There's a lot of ways to do this, and they don't all rely on what you do when writing with pen and paper.
Like, take 8 + 5. Working with Ana, I've found that I usually add 5 + 5 and then 3 more. I could also add 8 + 2 and then 3 more, but even though that's the same equation I would not do that. I don't know why. It's just easier to break apart the numbers that aren't fives.
Ana starts with 8 and starts counting upward. Evangeline... well, that's a bit big for her, but with smaller numbers she counts with her fingers, even if she's not using her fingers. So she would go "One, two, three, four, five. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight" before counting straight up to 13.
But I have no idea what other people do. I'm sure there's a huge range of things. (I'm sure plenty of people have, for the sake of convenience, all their single digit combinations memorized, for example.) What do you do?
There's a lot of ways to do this, and they don't all rely on what you do when writing with pen and paper.
Like, take 8 + 5. Working with Ana, I've found that I usually add 5 + 5 and then 3 more. I could also add 8 + 2 and then 3 more, but even though that's the same equation I would not do that. I don't know why. It's just easier to break apart the numbers that aren't fives.
Ana starts with 8 and starts counting upward. Evangeline... well, that's a bit big for her, but with smaller numbers she counts with her fingers, even if she's not using her fingers. So she would go "One, two, three, four, five. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight" before counting straight up to 13.
But I have no idea what other people do. I'm sure there's a huge range of things. (I'm sure plenty of people have, for the sake of convenience, all their single digit combinations memorized, for example.) What do you do?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:30 pm (UTC)(5 - 2) + 10 = 13
With higher digits, like dollar amounts, however, I round up and then do the subtraction. So, adding 98 cents and 88 cents, I'd call it 1.00 + 0.90 - 0.04. Whereas adding 97 cents and 87 cents, I'd straight out add the ones' place, carry over the ten, add the tens, etc.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 10:06 pm (UTC)I hold out my hands, fingers spread; if I'm multiplying 9 by 4, I'll put down the 4th finger from the left; the number of fingers to the left of the gap is the 10s digit (3), and the number of fingers to the right of the gap is the gap is the 1s digit (6).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 12:04 am (UTC)It was just how I was taught; I'm good at straight-up memorization of numbers.
When I'm counting out change, I do have to pause and break by fives (as it's mostly handed out as 'one, one, five, five' for 12). For some reason it messes up my counting, but I'm getting the numbers in my head.
When I have to do math in my head, it's usually visualization with my fingers doing each column and then doublechecking. 42 + 69 == 2+9 == 11 + (40+60) == 111.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 12:47 am (UTC)On a side note, both kids sound developmentally normal to the best of my memory. I believe that counting all of the numbers is the typical first step vast numbers of kids use when doing addition and then starting with one number (preferably the bigger one) and then adding the next number is one of the most common early refinements kids will develop. The other techniques tend to be later additions as math skills develop, although some kids obviously don't develop many techniques and some kids develop very sophisticated ones very young.
But what you're describing from them sounds very much like the sort of thing I'd hear in a psych class on normal development.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 07:45 am (UTC)One of the few memories I have from first grade is doing lots and lots of additions, for practice, and at one point going "8+6 ... (calculates) ... 14 ... wait, didn't it add up to that before, several problems ago? Maybe I should remember this sum; it's likely to come in useful in the future". (And it was definitely 8+6=14 where I had this epiphany.)
So I have single-digit additions memorised.
For two-digit (or more) numbers, though, my strategy varies, I suppose. But 8+5=13, I just know that, no calculating involved.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:32 pm (UTC)I also do number grouping by 10s, subtracting a little from one side and putting it on the other side until they are good numbers to add.
So 19+17 = 20+16 = 30+6 = 36.
OR 19+17=15+15+2+4=30+6=36.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:33 pm (UTC)This is a very interesting thread!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 06:01 pm (UTC)She also doesn't have Conservation down yet. She says, "What is 6+4?" I show her my hands, 6 fingers up 4 fingers down. "6 up, 4 down," I say. "It uses up all my fingers, you know how many fingers I have." But she still has to count them. She had an assignment that was essentially x + 3 = 10. Everything equalled 10, she just had to find X in each case. (It was an empty box, not an x). I put out 2 bowls and we counted 10 candies into one bowl. "This problem says, "3 plus something equals ten. Move 3 of these candies into the other bowl, and whatever is left over in the first bowl is the answer." She moved them, and I said, "Do we still have 10 altogether?" "No," she told me. "We didn't take any away or add any, we just moved them around. Are there 10, more than ten or less than ten?" "More than 10," she said, and even after counting them, she was surprised there were 7 in one and 3 in the other. And she continued to be surprised as we did every other combination of 10. I thought conservation developed around age 4, but she clearly doesn't have it yet.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 09:46 pm (UTC)I'm mildly curious if she would appear to have conservation if you ran the experiment with much smaller numbers, specifically ones she was able to subitize (count without counting, an amount small enough the person seeing it can just know how many are present, rather than where you need to number them out, how many a person can subititize is variable and also affected by experience). It might be a lot more obvious when she really can see it as she is looking, rather than needing to calculate it out to see it's the same amount.
Of course, I hear these things and I think... I couldn't add when I was in kindergarten. We didn't even start doing addition problems til first grade. Then when we did, I was utterly horrible at them. For me my first few years of education were a matter of being told I was gifted, but being really bad at reading and basic math, which was almost all of what school was then. So, part of me just wants to grab up other kids going more slowly and say, it's okay!
I'm also reminded that I tried a conservation problem in Middle School (because it was the set-up to a joke) and in my gifted class none of the kids could understand that the amount of liquid was conserved. By the end of the period, I was finally able to convince the ~teacher~ that conservation held. I ended up drawing circles to represent molecules of liquid, just to make the point that the liquid had to be conserved (because you assume no evaporation or spillage or condensation for that matter, which isn't actually the way the real world works, but we pretend for the sake of math problems and jokes).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-08 02:09 am (UTC)Things that are multiples of 5, 12, or 60 I use a clock.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-16 08:44 am (UTC)