Ana question...
Apr. 7th, 2006 12:58 amI've long since discovered that she listens better if I'm holding her hands, or otherwise touching her. Otherwise she gets distracted and may even miss that I'm talking. (It's annoying. She asks "what?", and then she has to ask again and again because she gets distracted midsentence. I really dislike being asked to repeat myself even once, so I'm sitting there getting annoyed at her for my own issues.)
I've no idea what's normal or not, of course. So... how normal is this for a three-year-old child?
I've no idea what's normal or not, of course. So... how normal is this for a three-year-old child?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:05 am (UTC)Although, I think the rate of "ooooh SHINY!"/distraction/lost-in-thought behaviour goes up in the humanities, particularly in Classics.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:06 am (UTC)I'm just curious as to whether or not this is normal.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:19 am (UTC)As for normal, wtf do I know. It's probably highly ABnormal, meaning she's just so advanced that whatever you're saying is just TOO boring for her to pay attention to?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:21 am (UTC)Does she generally want to be doing something with her hands? Like textures and such? Point out physical things?
The problem with trying to tell the sense dominance of a child that young though is that little kids tend to be more physical than adults anyway, so it's hard to get a good comparison. But it can be something to watch for as she grows. Especially since touch dominance can make schoolwork harder, if more tactile methods of learning aren't presented, but it can be compensated for if you're aware of it. It's not that touch-dominance makes learning any harder, but schools tend to be aimed at sight and hearing, since they are far more common.
I had a touch dominant teacher once, and it was dreadful for me. He insisted on us learning in tactile ways, and that just wasn't my mode. So, I imagine it's like that in reverse, but pretty much all the time, for the touch-dominant.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:43 am (UTC)It's interesting to me because it's a technique I learned to use with Bolt shortly after he was diagnosed. Not usually hands, though, Usually shoulder pressure, not too light! :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 05:44 am (UTC)It might just be an attention thing, where touch helps her stay grounded. I think most children are that way, honestly.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 06:48 am (UTC)My sister just turned 20 and there are still times when the only way to get her attention is to put a hand on her shoulder. When she was little it was never a problem of not listening it was just that she was so absorbed with what she was doing that the auditory prompt in the background didn't get through. And, as
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 07:01 am (UTC)Though
I'd say that it's a serious possibility that Ana is on the spectrum...not saying she absolutely is, but she might be at least BAP. Guess we'll see in a few years.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 07:51 am (UTC)When you combine this with the signs of sensory overload, you definitely build up a picture of some sort of sensory processing abnormality. Whether it's spectrum or not, I couldn't say, but I'd definitely want to pay attention to other sensory issues to see what else might be there.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 12:51 pm (UTC)To me, and I freely admit I'm no expert, if Ana is on the spectrum she's on the light end of it.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 02:52 pm (UTC)But then, I find it hard to focus on anything being said unless it really interests me. Usually what my boyfriend says about car audio equipment goes in one ear and out the other without ever being processed. lol
(and sorry for missing the quotation mark/apostrophe key. This computer has a broken one.)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 02:54 pm (UTC)As her mom, I agree with this, though I also am no expert. :-) I think, though, that your first point is the important one, that once you have experienced having (or in my case growing up with) kids on the spectrum, and learning how to handle their particular quirks, you simply are more *aware* of all these possible things. So therefore, all sorts of things that many parents might not even notice about their kid, are picked up on more by you due to your experience (the general "you" here.) The same way that Connie dissects all of Ana's language development due to her interest in linguistics - stuff most parents, I think we can *all* agree, do not even pay attention to lol! :-)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 03:07 pm (UTC)Some of them will space out and we have to change what we're saying to them...so instead of just their first name, we'll say their first and last name, or we'll touch their shoulder-touching them always works. That usually gets their attention. That seems to be much more like what you're talking about with Ana than the other example-that's just them not wanting to hear.
It kind of reminds me of myself-I can't talk on the phone. I get horribly distracted. It happens in person as well, but less often. I'll ask a question, space out during the answer, and then have to admit that I just did that. Haven't really figured out why yet, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 11:08 pm (UTC)Interesting. Would wanting to dance *all the time*, especially when frustrated or upset count? (I know it'd count as stimming, which is a bit annoying, as it distracts *me*. I want to tell her to stop doing it, even when it's really cute, because I can't watch it!)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 11:14 pm (UTC)People who are kinesthetically focused like to do physical activities, things with body motion, they may not be as focused on textures and such, but they'd generally enjoy learning in a way that involves muscle memory. Anecdotally, some older touch/kinesthetic (it can be hard to divide them and I'm not an expert) people often like to knit while in class, and it helps them learn better. Or do other simple tasks that involve physical movement. If forced to listen to a lecture while simply sitting still, they don't always learn much from it.
And while this is possible, I do agree when it was mentioned below that there may be more general sensory processing issues. And/or issues with switching attention.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 11:16 pm (UTC)At this point, I don't think she has the capability to actually lie. And I'm pretty sure this is normal for three year olds.
When she does try to lie, she's really really bad at it, for example, when she's snuck some ABC gum into her mouth, and she simply refuses to open her mouth at all. If she *would* open it, I might not even notice the gum in it! (Mind, I'm not telling her that.)
Her normal technique for getting out of trouble is to fess up, and then run away really fast or start fussing that she doesn't need a time-out (or to help clean up the mess, or to say sorry for hurting her friend, or whatever else it is).
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 11:18 pm (UTC)*stares*
Or, say, doodle or play freecell on the computer? I never was good at explaining that this helped me pay attention....
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 11:19 pm (UTC)Given that my family has no normality reference point, I wouldn't be surprised. But at the moment, most of what I see with her seems, well, like everybody else her age. A few things which *might* be strange, but which I have no basis of comparison for. That's why I ask - I don't know where normal is some of the time. And a few things which are unusual because they're advanced, but it's not all Ana - we work hard on those things she's now advanced with. That's why she's ahead of the curve in, for example, naming the capital of Canada.
So right now, I'm pretty sure she's skewed towards the normal.
But you're right. Things'll all be more obvious in a few years. If she's more towards the autistic side of things than I guess, I just hope she's happier in school than I was. When it comes around.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-07 11:22 pm (UTC)I don't know to what extent there are formal theories about the above, but that seems to be what is going on for a lot of people.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-08 12:22 am (UTC)