conuly: (Default)
2011-11-30 10:07 am
Entry tags:

PSA

Phishing attempts are being made on LJ. Short version: If you get a comment that is accompanied by a pop-up asking for your password, don't give it your password. If you've already done that, go change your password.

More information here
conuly: Quote: "I'm blogging this" (blogging)
2010-10-19 01:22 pm

Trying to get back into the swing of posting.

Firstly, let me just give this a resounding WTF?

In other news, this person wants information about traditional Thanksgiving foods. We're all MORE than happy to help... and I managed to get into a flame war about the definition of the word yam.

Well, I tried not to. I said sorry, I pointed out it's my own personal pet peeve (yams! They're African! You can't (easily) get them over here! THEY ARE NOT THE SAME AS SWEET POTATOES!), and I posted a few explanatory links...

but when the person I'm talking to goes "In America we, as Americans, call them yams" I have to point out that I, in fact, have been an American all my life, have lived here all my life, and only see them (mis)labeled "yams" in the supermarket (the same place that sells "wanuts", "peers", and "apels", so I don't take this very seriously) sometimes (probably due to dialectical variation). Most of the time they're labeled "small" and "large" sweet potatoes. And I certainly do not call them yams.

The yam issue is kinda like the robin issue. Settlers from England saw these birds kinda like their robins, didn't see their robins, and so decided to call these new birds "robins" just for the heck of it. Now we distinguish them by calling them "American" robins and "English" robins. Similarly, slaves from Africa saw these tubers kinda like their yams, didn't see their yams, and decided to call these new tubers "yams" for lack of a better term. Which is all well and good until a new wave of immigrants from Africa (and apparently the West Indies) hits and they bring real yams with them! I'd be happy to call them "American" yams and "African" yams (it's not like sweet potatoes are really just "sweet" potatoes either!) but to just use the term "yam" bugs me.
conuly: (Default)
2010-09-10 06:26 pm
Entry tags:

Well, LJ news has updated. (Finally.)

At the last possible second for "see you next week!" that doesn't make people work overtime.

It's pretty much what I expected. LJ made no changes yet, promised to make very few changes "in the next update", and all of a sudden the same people who hours ago were still comparing the recent code change to rape and LJ to a physically abusive partner, who as recently as yesterday were discussing calling the ACLU (see, it's stuff like this that makes me say some people were overreacting just a little bit. Is LJ linking to Facebook really a civil liberties issue?), who for the past week have been passing around DW invite codes like candy (VOX works for everybody, apparently)...

Yeah, these people are all going "YAY! YOU ARE AWESOME! THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!" all over the comments.
conuly: (Default)
2010-09-03 05:40 pm
Entry tags:

So, some articles on the recent... thing.

Firstly, if anybody is interested in creating a journal at DW, I've culled a lot of codes from old posts. I feel bad for the poor, unused codes! They're not getting any love. *sniff*

And now, three links I got from The Post of Doom, before it, uh, broke.

Facebook won't shut down stalker
LiveJournal integrates Facebook into its website
After Facebook and LiveJournal, Russia buys Twitter

Edit: A last minute link on an alternative to Facebook launching on the 15th.
conuly: (Default)
2009-07-17 01:16 pm
Entry tags:

Now everybody can make pingbacks, not just paid accounts

Which is great. [livejournal.com profile] azurelunatic has a whole post here about the benefits of pingbacks and when you should set them up and the whole point of this all.

However, sadly, she misses the most important reason to enable pingbacks! You should enable pingbacks because the [livejournal.com profile] pingback_bot is super cute. *nodnodnod* It's like having a kitten randomly visit your journal and be friendly, except it's a robot and doesn't say anything other than "Hey, somebody linked to you".

Edit: If you guys all link to this so I can see the cute little pingback bot in my comments (remember, you have to enable it or it won't work!), I'll be thrilled.
conuly: (Default)
2008-08-02 10:58 pm
Entry tags:

Some poor girl over at [profile] cloth_pads lost her entire stash.

Just had it stolen out of the washing machine. (Well, I suppose she could be lying, I certainly don't know, but it harms me not to assume it's the truth.)

Well, I commented offering to send her a pad when I got paid (and I got FIRST POST too, which is always nifty), and then umpetyumpteen people commented after saying the same thing - and she never replied to any of us, which was just great. I mean, here I am with the karma and gold stars of having offered, and I didn't even have to do anything! That just rocked!

Of course, just when I started feeling great about that, she did reply to everybody with her address in a locked post. She got more than enough pads (at least one person sent her a dozen or so!), but I *had* offered, so I went over to [livejournal.com profile] daybreaksadness's etsy shop and bought a "pay it forward" pad for $.20.

So I still got to do an actual good deed, instead of wallowing in intentions, and it didn't cost me much. That's good :)
conuly: (Default)
2008-07-20 01:31 pm
Entry tags:
conuly: (Default)
2008-05-12 11:09 pm
Entry tags:

Okay, world?

LIVEJOURNAL IS NOT PEOPLED WITH DOCTORS.

Oh, I'm sure there are doctors here, but none of them can really prove it anyway.

If you or your loved one or your KID is acting funny, and you have the opportunity to post on LJ asking "Gee, should I take him to the doctor?" - stop and think. If the odds are that everybody is going to say yes, get off the computer and head out now.

Repeat the mantra with me now, everybody: WHEN IN DOUBT, CHECK IT OUT.

I'm not saying you should rush to the emergency room on a Friday night just because your precious stubbed her pinky toe - but when you suspect a serious injury or illness just get up and go already. Don't waste valuable time posting on LJ, because your uninsured ass is just going to end up in the hospital anyway, might as well be sooner than later, right?

GOD, people.
conuly: (Default)
2008-05-04 01:58 pm
Entry tags:

Well, I think I've cleared most of the stuff I never read off my friends page

And now... it moves a little too slowly for my taste. I'm hopeless!

But I'm going to give myself a few weeks to get used to this slower, gentler pace before I start adding anything new again - and I think I'm going to think a lot more carefully before I add any new comms. Those were the worst offenders, you know. Updating very frequently, but I never read (most) of them!
conuly: (Default)
2008-04-02 02:12 am
Entry tags:

How this ended up on MTS, I don't know.

O NOES! ITS STUPID! SHE SAVED LIVES!

Here's the thing. Unless her school has a rule that states "discipline for breaking school rules shall be suspended (no pun) if, while breaking the rules, the student does something moderately heroic" the fact is they really have no choice but to punish her for skipping school.

Because she was, in fact, skipping school.

Unless her school is set up very oddly, I imagine that the only way to go home before the end of the day is to go to the office and tell them you're sick, and then wait for a parent to either pick you up or tell them to send you home. And she didn't do that. Which means she was skipping school and, yeah, breaking the rules.

And she says she was sick, but I said that all the time. And half the time I just either came home anyway or else never left home to begin with. I didn't "skip school to come home", I did it so I wouldn't have to go to school. I had no real desire to do anything, so I defaulted to going home and watching TV, or reading, or playing video games. (This all assumes she really did intend to go home, of course - she may have meant to just stop at home and pick something up before going out again, or to take the bus near to home and then do something else. Or maybe she was really sick, I don't know.)

"But she did something heroic!"

Yeah, through coincidence. And despite what everybody over there is claiming, she didn't really "choose" to be a hero. She kinda had that choice thrust upon her, as the other choice was "sit here and get seriously injured or killed, along with the driver and all the little kids". Not much of a choice.

"But don't they cancel out????"

No, they don't. They're two unrelated things. "Sure, he robbed a bank - but he gave some of the money to charity!" It doesn't really work that way, or at least, it shouldn't.

Okay, if she'd skipped school for the specific purpose of committing the heroic deed... maybe. "Yeah, he robbed a bank - but he only did it because it was the only way he'd be able to ransom his wife from the nefarious evildoers, and all the rest of the money went to the poor!"

Or if you said the policy was wrong, that the punishment was too much for the crime, okay. But I really fail to see how a day of Saturday detention is really that arduous. I mean, it might be, but... really? It's probably not.
conuly: (Default)
2008-03-14 01:13 am
Entry tags:

One take on the recent LJ-scandal

With real world contact info, which I agree will probably be a lot more useful than emails.

(And please - don't harass the support board. I'm not currently doing support, but I have a lot of sympathy for people who can't do anything more than tell you what they've got to tell you, and who have no control over the situation anyway. Just direct your outrage or concern or whatever immediately to the correct people.)
conuly: (Default)
2007-09-08 05:39 pm
Entry tags:

Is it just me?

Am I the only person who thinks that 3 am is an unreasonable hour for a baby/toddler (young toddler? Older baby? Whatever) to be awake and playing with people? Is it perfectly sensible to find quiet games to play with the kid at that hour instead of putting her back to sleep? And when asked for quiet games, is it wrong to suggest that maybe, just maybe, the kid needs to sleep more than she needs to have fun? (Not to mention it can't be good for the parents to be up at all hours when they presumably do not have odd sleeping habits by nature.)

Because, frankly, I think the advice (politely stated at first... the person in question doesn't like me, and I feel no need to keep up the pretense) "PUT THE KID BACK TO BED" is eminently better than whatever That Twit was fishing for.
conuly: (Default)
2007-08-03 11:10 pm

A link on "saving LJ"

Right here.

In other news, fandom-y journals, especially with "dangerous" content (you know the sort of stuff I mean) are apparently being deleted, so go locky, okay?
conuly: (Default)
2007-06-02 07:33 am
Entry tags:

An interesting link found from [profile] zannechaos

On What Just Happened.

(However, all her comments are here, even though the rant is less complete.)

Is any of this true? I don't know, and would really appreciate more information. But it sure is interesting.

Also, if the fandom counting comm struck you as a good idea, you may also be interested in [livejournal.com profile] fandompays.

Edit again: Now there's people talking about buying up lots and lots of SA/LJ stock themselves. I wish them luck, though, again, not sure this is really going to work. It certainly won't work until somebody organizes this shit.
conuly: (Default)
2007-05-31 09:09 am
Entry tags:

So, WFI had a partner group? Or something?

absolutezerounited.blogspot.com/2007/05/dropping-like-flies.html

I'm only posting the link so I can also post this quote:

The truth of the matter is that the only person who would value free speech more than the safety of a child is a person who WA LA endangers children. You're all clueless and every single one of these statements prove it.

Have you ever noticed that people who do things you disagree with (or think things you disagree with, but I do agree with the principle that little kids shouldn't be harmed. Hard not to agree with that one) can't spell?

GODDAMMIT YOU TWITS GET IT RIGHT! VOILA! VOILA! IT AIN'T THAT HARD, AND MISSPELLING IT ONLY DESTROYS YOUR CREDIBILITY!

Thank you.

Of course, there are still disturbing comms and individuals on LJ. And any of them dumb enough to put incriminating evidence in their interests have now been warned.
conuly: (Default)
2007-05-31 09:01 am
Entry tags:

I'm behind the times

Yar. Here be updates.

I'm maybe-not-literally waiting with bated breath to see which journals are or are not restored.
conuly: (Default)
2007-05-31 01:25 am
Entry tags:

Okay, guys?

I'm not saying I understand all the legal talk that's being bandied about, because I don't. And I'm not saying I agree with what LJ's done, because I'm pretty sure I don't. Heck, I don't even think I know most of the story!

But I do understand this:

It's not a first amendment thing. The only people who have to follow the first amendment are the government. The US government. Specifically Congress, but that seems to be interpreted to mean "Any government, no matter how small or municipal, that's part of the US".

And last time I checked, LiveJournal was in no way the government. We don't pay taxes to LiveJournal, and they don't have cops, and we don't even have to pay for our journals. They can make a rule banning purple fonts, and suspending everybody who ever used a purple font, like, ever if they like. It'd be stupid, you know it and I know it, but it's still be legal.

So stop complaining about the first amendment. Complain about freedom of speech or illogic or whatever - but it's not the first amendment.

(Also, hate to burst everybody's bubble, but I really don't think that the petitions and machinegun commenting plans are going to work. Do they ever? You can spend your energy and time however you like, I guess, but... *shrugs*)
conuly: (Default)
2007-05-29 07:16 pm
Entry tags:

Some LJ comms have been suspended

Here's the first bit.
And here's an explanation.

I'd just advise everybody to take whatever precautions, from nothing to full-on-paranoia, that they think is necessary to protect their own journals.
conuly: (Default)
2007-03-04 10:59 pm
Entry tags:

Heh.

Give somebody a FAQ link, and they go ahead, read it, and delete their post! Another happy customer!

(And people say I'm not helpful. Tsk. Tsk. Tsk some more.)

Instead of giving a man on fire (and warming him for a day), I have set the man on fire, thereby keeping him warm the rest of his life. Take that, you doubters!

(With luck, she'll also take my advice about shutting up so it can all blow over. That really *is* good advice, and a better course of action than telling us how mean most (but not all) of us really were, and pointedly thanking the few non-mean people. Which didn't include me. I'll survive. Hey, maybe she'll go tell Elise how horrible I am! There's a bright side! She might even start a site! I should make a few typos, make it official....)


(Can you tell I'm having fun here?)
conuly: (Default)
2007-01-30 07:50 pm

Y'know, just because somebody gives you advice you don't like....

...that does not mean you can discount the advice as though it was worthless. Nor does it mean you should delete the comments in a snit because it's not the advice you wanted.

(Oddly enough, it wasn't me. I did do some backseat modding though. That wasn't appropriate. Oh well.)

(And it's almost my birthday! Tomorrow! *hugs people who gave b-day messages* Yay! 24! YAY!!!!)