Ooh, linguistic ignorance!
Fun!
I'm going to be sick. There's no more justification for being prejudicided against speakers of a non-Standard dialect than to be prejudiced against practicioners of a minority religion, but here it comes again! And yet, when I point out that it doesn't mean that this woman is retarded, I get yelled at, and words get put in my mouth. Because, of course, it's so much easier to contest what I didn't say than what I actually *did* say.
I need to hie me to Jenn's. I'll talk later. Djusk' a.
I'm going to be sick. There's no more justification for being prejudicided against speakers of a non-Standard dialect than to be prejudiced against practicioners of a minority religion, but here it comes again! And yet, when I point out that it doesn't mean that this woman is retarded, I get yelled at, and words get put in my mouth. Because, of course, it's so much easier to contest what I didn't say than what I actually *did* say.
I need to hie me to Jenn's. I'll talk later. Djusk' a.
no subject
no subject
How many times can you say "people master their grammar by the age of six" without
forgetting which word ends in -arwithout crying?no subject
no subject
If they're still at it when I get on again, I'm posting in
Or maybe not, that might cause even *more* drama.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I could never cut down when I was smoking. Kudos to her that she did as much as she did.
It sounds to me like she intends giving up.
I gave up when James was 8 months old(with the aid of the patch) & my kids all think cigarette smoke is gross.
I smoked outside, too. Unfortunately, that didn't stop the kids getting sick on the smoke that lingered on me.
no subject
no subject
I thought the perspective of someone thats been there might help, Iunno.
(no subject)
no subject
I can understand slang, and honestly, no one I know uses 100% proper English all the time (lest they come out sounding like Storm). But if I was speaking to a newspaper/whatever, a public forum, I would sure as hell make sure that my speech fell into the realm of acceptable English language. Knowing the difference between right and wrong and chosing to use the non-standard version is an informed choice. Refusing to learn the difference between right and wrong is just plain stupid.
no subject
no subject
Standard English is called that because there is a Standard that everyone is held up to. You start messing with that, and all hell breaks loose.
no subject
But I very, very much doubt that you will find *any* school that would say using double negatives is correct.
Grammar isn't something you learn in a school. In fact, children typically *master* their native grammar before they're old enough for school.
Standard English is called that because there is a Standard that everyone is held up to. You start messing with that, and all hell breaks loose.
How do you know? Please explain this to me. It doesn't make sense to me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
Re: An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
Re: An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
Re: An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
no subject
no subject
How many times can you say "people master their grammar by the age of six" without
forgetting which word ends in -arwithout crying?no subject
no subject
If they're still at it when I get on again, I'm posting in
Or maybe not, that might cause even *more* drama.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I could never cut down when I was smoking. Kudos to her that she did as much as she did.
It sounds to me like she intends giving up.
I gave up when James was 8 months old(with the aid of the patch) & my kids all think cigarette smoke is gross.
I smoked outside, too. Unfortunately, that didn't stop the kids getting sick on the smoke that lingered on me.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I can understand slang, and honestly, no one I know uses 100% proper English all the time (lest they come out sounding like Storm). But if I was speaking to a newspaper/whatever, a public forum, I would sure as hell make sure that my speech fell into the realm of acceptable English language. Knowing the difference between right and wrong and chosing to use the non-standard version is an informed choice. Refusing to learn the difference between right and wrong is just plain stupid.
no subject
no subject
Standard English is called that because there is a Standard that everyone is held up to. You start messing with that, and all hell breaks loose.
no subject
But I very, very much doubt that you will find *any* school that would say using double negatives is correct.
Grammar isn't something you learn in a school. In fact, children typically *master* their native grammar before they're old enough for school.
Standard English is called that because there is a Standard that everyone is held up to. You start messing with that, and all hell breaks loose.
How do you know? Please explain this to me. It doesn't make sense to me.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
Re: An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
Re: An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.
Re: An aside on what was apparently inconsequential to you.