Um...

[identity profile] navkat.livejournal.com 2004-11-06 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
hi, I am not trying to be rude or anything but is there a reason why you are not approving my support requests? One of them gave the exact same information you did (and in the same tone) but instead of approving, you answered over me.

Did I do something wrong? or did you just want the points or something?

Sorry to comment here but your userinfo doesn't leave an email address.
thanks,
-jenn

[identity profile] dkmnow.livejournal.com 2004-11-06 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup. The potential for hacking and fraud with these machines is very old news. It's been well over a year since the Johns Hopkins research team concluded that black box voting is "a threat to democracy." Unfortunately, the fact that nothing significant was ever done to address the problems is apparently non-news. For the most part, the corporate media still won't touch it. You do the math.

"Follow the money."

:-\

Um...

[identity profile] navkat.livejournal.com 2004-11-06 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
hi, I am not trying to be rude or anything but is there a reason why you are not approving my support requests? One of them gave the exact same information you did (and in the same tone) but instead of approving, you answered over me.

Did I do something wrong? or did you just want the points or something?

Sorry to comment here but your userinfo doesn't leave an email address.
thanks,
-jenn

[identity profile] dkmnow.livejournal.com 2004-11-06 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup. The potential for hacking and fraud with these machines is very old news. It's been well over a year since the Johns Hopkins research team concluded that black box voting is "a threat to democracy." Unfortunately, the fact that nothing significant was ever done to address the problems is apparently non-news. For the most part, the corporate media still won't touch it. You do the math.

"Follow the money."

:-\