Just removed a bunch of people off my Friends list, it had grown too large.

[conuly]

I mostly used the criteria of "how well do I think I know this person" when deciding to remove people, so.

If you were removed, and really, really, reeeeeeeeeally want to be put back on, come ask, but it's not as though all my posts are locked.

This has been a public service announcement, courtesy of the senate and the people of Rome. Carthago delenda est!

Comments

[deathweasel.livejournal.com]

I am honored to have remained.
*happy*

[l33tminion]

Ditto.

[dkmnow.livejournal.com]

I, too, seem to have survived yet another purge. Buggered if I know why.

I feel as if the collection agency forgot to intercept my tax refund. Or something. Heh.

:-p

[ratkrycek.livejournal.com]

Re-add me if you want me; if you don't, don't. I know I don't post much, but it's probably preferable to, say, July '02, which I just read while looking for something, and was stunned that I could post 7 times a day about absolutely nothing.

One thing: I do like you, and I do read you (I love the articles and commentary you post). I also know you removed me awhile ago (perhaps for lack of postage, I figured) but I just hope it's okay with you if I keep you friended if you don't friend me back, ie, not too creepy. Some people get kind of offended/bothered if they remove someone and the other person still reads them. Just checkin' to make sure it's okay. :)

[conuly]

Every time my list creeps over 500, I remove most people who haven't updated in a long time. The only exceptions are people I know from off LiveJournal, whom I'm generally close to.

It's definitely okay to read my journal if I've removed you. I'd never say otherwise, 'tis... well, stupid. If I didn't want people reading my journal, I'd lock all my posts.

[beetlebomb.livejournal.com]

I'm honoured to remain! :)

[deathweasel.livejournal.com]

I am honored to have remained.
*happy*

[l33tminion]

Ditto.

[dkmnow.livejournal.com]

I, too, seem to have survived yet another purge. Buggered if I know why.

I feel as if the collection agency forgot to intercept my tax refund. Or something. Heh.

:-p

[ratkrycek.livejournal.com]

Re-add me if you want me; if you don't, don't. I know I don't post much, but it's probably preferable to, say, July '02, which I just read while looking for something, and was stunned that I could post 7 times a day about absolutely nothing.

One thing: I do like you, and I do read you (I love the articles and commentary you post). I also know you removed me awhile ago (perhaps for lack of postage, I figured) but I just hope it's okay with you if I keep you friended if you don't friend me back, ie, not too creepy. Some people get kind of offended/bothered if they remove someone and the other person still reads them. Just checkin' to make sure it's okay. :)

[conuly]

Every time my list creeps over 500, I remove most people who haven't updated in a long time. The only exceptions are people I know from off LiveJournal, whom I'm generally close to.

It's definitely okay to read my journal if I've removed you. I'd never say otherwise, 'tis... well, stupid. If I didn't want people reading my journal, I'd lock all my posts.

[beetlebomb.livejournal.com]

I'm honoured to remain! :)