conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote2005-05-25 03:48 am

I've told you before that Wikpedia is evil, right? It keeps making me think...

Current thought: With all the names that pop up in the Bible, why are so many of them not common in English?

[identity profile] lithiana.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
hmm.. but quite a few of them are, aren't they? i'd imagine a lot have mutated over time, too, even if they were originally biblical.

[identity profile] kibbles.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
Is Mary like that in the bible?

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/The-Virgin-Mary

ext_78: A picture of a plush animal. It looks a bit like a cross between a duck and a platypus. (Default)

[identity profile] pne.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
Fashion, perhaps?

I've got the impression that, say, 150 years ago, Biblical names were more common, or rather, the diversity of Biblical names was greater; there aren't a whole lot of people these days called Hephzibah, for example.

So part of it is changed naming conventions; another is undoubtedly decreased familiarity with the Bible among the general populace, which is kind of necessary to know about the more 'obscure' names.

[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose its because Belialbethingibob does not roll off the tongue like Mark or Luke does. Ok, I made that one up, but from Bible readings I did at school, I recall coming across some real tiongue twisters.

The overtly biblical names may decline as Secular humanism takes over, but there are plenty of secular heroes that will inspire people to name thier kids Peter, Paul and Mary :)

[identity profile] lithiana.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
hmm.. but quite a few of them are, aren't they? i'd imagine a lot have mutated over time, too, even if they were originally biblical.

[identity profile] kibbles.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
Is Mary like that in the bible?

http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/The-Virgin-Mary

ext_78: A picture of a plush animal. It looks a bit like a cross between a duck and a platypus. (Default)

[identity profile] pne.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
Fashion, perhaps?

I've got the impression that, say, 150 years ago, Biblical names were more common, or rather, the diversity of Biblical names was greater; there aren't a whole lot of people these days called Hephzibah, for example.

So part of it is changed naming conventions; another is undoubtedly decreased familiarity with the Bible among the general populace, which is kind of necessary to know about the more 'obscure' names.

[identity profile] mintogrubb.livejournal.com 2005-05-25 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose its because Belialbethingibob does not roll off the tongue like Mark or Luke does. Ok, I made that one up, but from Bible readings I did at school, I recall coming across some real tiongue twisters.

The overtly biblical names may decline as Secular humanism takes over, but there are plenty of secular heroes that will inspire people to name thier kids Peter, Paul and Mary :)