*frowns*
I don't know what's wrong. I slept something like 14 hours today, I'm still a bit out of it. Guess I'm a little sick. *shrugs*
Anyway, on the topic of the tsunammi, which you've noticed I've avoided talking about... My mom, every time there's a disaster, she makes sure to mention that the Red Cross is Not To Be Trusted, that there've been horror stories about the Red Cross helping out and then asking for payment after, that they don't spend as much in areas as they should, that sort of thing. I don't know if that's true, and, really, it doesn't make a difference. She actually wants to help out with the disaster, she's not going to donate to the Red Cross, if anybody has any other reputable charities for her, that'd be wonderful.
Thanks.
Edit: Better question, does anybody know where I can find out how much a charity gives to it's intended recipients out of every dollar it recieves?
Anyway, on the topic of the tsunammi, which you've noticed I've avoided talking about... My mom, every time there's a disaster, she makes sure to mention that the Red Cross is Not To Be Trusted, that there've been horror stories about the Red Cross helping out and then asking for payment after, that they don't spend as much in areas as they should, that sort of thing. I don't know if that's true, and, really, it doesn't make a difference. She actually wants to help out with the disaster, she's not going to donate to the Red Cross, if anybody has any other reputable charities for her, that'd be wonderful.
Thanks.
Edit: Better question, does anybody know where I can find out how much a charity gives to it's intended recipients out of every dollar it recieves?
no subject
no subject
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1229/p10s01-usgn.html
no subject
no subject
Oxfam is good, as is Medecins sans Frontiers (Doctos Without Borders).
no subject
I wonder if you can donate to a specific RC country?
no subject
no subject
Some quick poking around revealed that Action Against Hunger uses $.91 of every dollar (http://www.actionagainsthunger.org/who/legal.html), Doctors Without Borders spends a little over 85% (http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/donate/info.shtml) of its donate money directly on its programs, with the rest going to management and fundraising, and Oxfam uses 79p of every pound. (It seems Oxfam's servers are under stress, so I can't get back to the page that says that, or get to the American branch's page.)
Just look under the "donations" or "legal" section of charity websites and you'll probably the info you want.
no subject
no subject
I donate to Plan USA (http://www.planusa.org) through a child sponsorship-- they have a good program and an emergency child relief fund to help kids during emergencies like this (Well, usually much smaller emergencies, actually). They also have a program to end child trafficking-- which is going to be a HUGE problem with the number of children who just became separated from their families or orphaned, and who are basically lost, traumatized, and at serious risk for being taken by traffickers. Plan USA is not a "convert to Christianity and get food" type of organization.
I have never had a problem with the Red Cross, and soldiers I've spoken to say it's a great organization, but who knows if that's always the case, right? I'd say that claim of your mother's probably deserves more research, to be honest.
ALL non-profit organizations in the US must disclose their financial statement, including what percentage of their money goes towards "the mission," whatever that mission be. 70% towards the mission is considered good-- anything less is really too much overhead. 85% or greater is excellent.
no subject
Oh, probably, but it's not like it's the only charity around, is it? So right or wrong, she can still donate without me having to research the Red Cross. I wouldn't even know what to look for.
no subject
The Center for International Disaster Information (http://www.cidi.org) has information on a number of present disasters, and also has one of the most comprehensive lists of tsunami aid organizations I've seen so far. They also have a very helpful FAQ.
Amazon (http://www.amazon.com) seems to have become the preferred site for donating money to the American Red Cross (http://www.redcross.org), which despite it's problems is still an organization that I think is best able to respond to the massive aid required. Doctors are good. Food is good. There are organizations that are wonderful in their select areas. But the overall massive response of "everything else" - generators, shelter, communication, vehicles, etc etc, is I think handled wonderfully by the various arms of the Red Cross (American, International and Crescent).
no subject
no subject
no subject
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1229/p10s01-usgn.html
no subject
no subject
Oxfam is good, as is Medecins sans Frontiers (Doctos Without Borders).
no subject
I wonder if you can donate to a specific RC country?
no subject
no subject
Some quick poking around revealed that Action Against Hunger uses $.91 of every dollar (http://www.actionagainsthunger.org/who/legal.html), Doctors Without Borders spends a little over 85% (http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/donate/info.shtml) of its donate money directly on its programs, with the rest going to management and fundraising, and Oxfam uses 79p of every pound. (It seems Oxfam's servers are under stress, so I can't get back to the page that says that, or get to the American branch's page.)
Just look under the "donations" or "legal" section of charity websites and you'll probably the info you want.
no subject
no subject
I donate to Plan USA (http://www.planusa.org) through a child sponsorship-- they have a good program and an emergency child relief fund to help kids during emergencies like this (Well, usually much smaller emergencies, actually). They also have a program to end child trafficking-- which is going to be a HUGE problem with the number of children who just became separated from their families or orphaned, and who are basically lost, traumatized, and at serious risk for being taken by traffickers. Plan USA is not a "convert to Christianity and get food" type of organization.
I have never had a problem with the Red Cross, and soldiers I've spoken to say it's a great organization, but who knows if that's always the case, right? I'd say that claim of your mother's probably deserves more research, to be honest.
ALL non-profit organizations in the US must disclose their financial statement, including what percentage of their money goes towards "the mission," whatever that mission be. 70% towards the mission is considered good-- anything less is really too much overhead. 85% or greater is excellent.
no subject
Oh, probably, but it's not like it's the only charity around, is it? So right or wrong, she can still donate without me having to research the Red Cross. I wouldn't even know what to look for.
no subject
The Center for International Disaster Information (http://www.cidi.org) has information on a number of present disasters, and also has one of the most comprehensive lists of tsunami aid organizations I've seen so far. They also have a very helpful FAQ.
Amazon (http://www.amazon.com) seems to have become the preferred site for donating money to the American Red Cross (http://www.redcross.org), which despite it's problems is still an organization that I think is best able to respond to the massive aid required. Doctors are good. Food is good. There are organizations that are wonderful in their select areas. But the overall massive response of "everything else" - generators, shelter, communication, vehicles, etc etc, is I think handled wonderfully by the various arms of the Red Cross (American, International and Crescent).
no subject