conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote2004-11-28 03:48 am

Taken from [profile] anti_righty

Don't say cheese!

[livejournal.com profile] varro is right. You can't make this stuff up.

[identity profile] divabat.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Agh, we went to get US visas earlier this year and there were 928493285493285 guidelines just for the photos. White background, had to be a certain size (very inconvenient as it wasn't the standard passpost photo size - we had to find a specialist photo shop o get them done), etc etc. Though I did smile a bit in mine, and it was accepted, so feh :P

[identity profile] readerravenclaw.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 08:06 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, definitely real. It's listed in the rules and all. (http://travel.state.gov/passport/pptphotos/glossary.html)

But don't think it's just the US - Britain passed the same law. Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3541444.stm

And I'm a bit confused - why was this posted in [livejournal.com profile] anti_righty? It's a new technology decision, not a "righty" law, and besides, who cares? Not smiling in a picture isn't exactly a terrible hardship if it means improved face recognition capabilities, which means less error and less time lost at airports.

[identity profile] codeman38.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 09:14 am (UTC)(link)
Ehh, I've never been good at smiling for pictures anyway... it always looks forced.

[identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I've always been told not to smile for passport photos anyway *shrugs*

Besides, who actually is smiling when they pass through immigration :0P

[identity profile] lakidaa.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I wasn't allowed to smile in my passport (last year, so I could go on a trip to Italy-- which rocked, except for the crazy Roman drivers. seriously.)

It makes sense. I mean, one's face is usually not smiling. Well, not my face, anyway.

[identity profile] divabat.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Agh, we went to get US visas earlier this year and there were 928493285493285 guidelines just for the photos. White background, had to be a certain size (very inconvenient as it wasn't the standard passpost photo size - we had to find a specialist photo shop o get them done), etc etc. Though I did smile a bit in mine, and it was accepted, so feh :P

[identity profile] readerravenclaw.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 08:06 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, definitely real. It's listed in the rules and all. (http://travel.state.gov/passport/pptphotos/glossary.html)

But don't think it's just the US - Britain passed the same law. Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3541444.stm

And I'm a bit confused - why was this posted in [livejournal.com profile] anti_righty? It's a new technology decision, not a "righty" law, and besides, who cares? Not smiling in a picture isn't exactly a terrible hardship if it means improved face recognition capabilities, which means less error and less time lost at airports.

[identity profile] codeman38.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 09:14 am (UTC)(link)
Ehh, I've never been good at smiling for pictures anyway... it always looks forced.

[identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I've always been told not to smile for passport photos anyway *shrugs*

Besides, who actually is smiling when they pass through immigration :0P

[identity profile] lakidaa.livejournal.com 2004-11-28 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I wasn't allowed to smile in my passport (last year, so I could go on a trip to Italy-- which rocked, except for the crazy Roman drivers. seriously.)

It makes sense. I mean, one's face is usually not smiling. Well, not my face, anyway.