conuly: (cucumber)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote2010-02-07 01:30 am
Entry tags:

Re-reading Making Money today.

"Trolls don't have a word for machismo in much the same way that puddles don't have a word for water."

Do you think that's a variant of the "Eskimos have 20 zillion words for snow" line? (BTW - they don't by any sensible view of the word (no more than we do, certainly), and it wouldn't matter if they did.)
ext_12881: DO NOT TAKE (Default)

[identity profile] tsukikage85.livejournal.com 2010-02-07 06:35 am (UTC)(link)
Are we talking trolls in the internet sense or the fairytale sense?

[identity profile] atdelphi.livejournal.com 2010-02-07 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
It reminds me of the claims that such and such a language (usually that belonging to an 'enemy' culture) doesn't have a word for "freedom" or "love" or "identity," etc., but with the determinism inverted.

(Also, I just finished the audio book of Going Postal and am itching to revisit Making Money.)
ext_45018: (Words words words.)

[identity profile] oloriel.livejournal.com 2010-02-07 10:49 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose it's an inversion of the same theme, yeah.

IIRC, Pterry is talking about this line (or a similar line from Small Gods, not certain) and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in The Folklore of Discworld - I think he's actually bringing up (and dismantling) the Eskimo line in that context. But I'd have to look it up to be sure, it's been a year since I read that. Or it might have been on tvTropes. *scratches head*

Edited 2010-02-07 10:51 (UTC)