You know what's great about Harry Potter?
When people caught on to the huge wait times between books (and now the series is ended, of course), they started publishing a whole heckuva lot of other kid and YA fantasy books, much of which is really good - and even the more obviously derivative (of HP, naturally) books are still pretty nifty.
You know what's bad about Harry Potter? All these books - especially the more obviously pandering ones - have titles along the lines of Namety Name and the Adjectivial Noun. As it's now been almost two years since DH was released, can we all move past that, guys?
(And can some of these books have Namety Name protagonists other than white guys? Seriously? I mean, I'm all for encouraging boys to read, and I know that society tends to discourage them from reading books about girls, cooties and all that, but really now!)
You know what's bad about Harry Potter? All these books - especially the more obviously pandering ones - have titles along the lines of Namety Name and the Adjectivial Noun. As it's now been almost two years since DH was released, can we all move past that, guys?
(And can some of these books have Namety Name protagonists other than white guys? Seriously? I mean, I'm all for encouraging boys to read, and I know that society tends to discourage them from reading books about girls, cooties and all that, but really now!)
What's good about HP
(to both parts)
no subject
no subject
But her books fit into an entirely different set of formulas, none of which (except perhaps the "go away to school" group, which isn't set in stone) apply to the Namety Name books. Notice that none of hers are "Alanna Lastname and the Whole Crossdressing Thing" or "Daine Sarrassri and the Emperor Mage".
Mage, Firefox? You can't recognize mage as a word? In a word, you suck.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And oh god. Most of these books are series, so they'll keep using that title pattern until the series is over, and some of them are bound to spawn their own copycats... Yeesh.