FYI: Intellipedia, a similar project by the very same people has been running for more than two years now without any overly public debacles. When its existence was publicized, there were many comments that it would be "hacked in a few days", and since then I haven't seen anyone even claim they hacked Intellipedia, much less provide proof. (Though sensible people might sell that information straight to the Russians etc. instead of going public, of course.)
Give these people some credit, I think quite an amount of the people setting up and maintaining these systems are hackers in the traditional sense of the word ;]
FYI: Intellipedia, a similar project by the very same people has been running for more than two years now without any overly public debacles. When its existence was publicized, there were many comments that it would be "hacked in a few days", and since then I haven't seen anyone even claim they hacked Intellipedia, much less provide proof. (Though sensible people might sell that information straight to the Russians etc. instead of going public, of course.)
Give these people some credit, I think quite an amount of the people setting up and maintaining these systems are hackers in the traditional sense of the word ;]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
best,
Joel. Who regretfully hasn't been competent in that field for a decade, now.
no subject
2. Which field? Hacking or spying?
no subject
best,
Joel
no subject
Give these people some credit, I think quite an amount of the people setting up and maintaining these systems are hackers in the traditional sense of the word ;]
no subject
no subject
best,
Joel. Who regretfully hasn't been competent in that field for a decade, now.
no subject
2. Which field? Hacking or spying?
no subject
best,
Joel
no subject
Give these people some credit, I think quite an amount of the people setting up and maintaining these systems are hackers in the traditional sense of the word ;]
no subject