conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote2006-04-06 12:06 am
Entry tags:

So, I've been looking up lullabies.

And I've discovered something. Two sometimes.

1. In the world of lullabies-concerning-future-jobs, they all talk about what their son is going to do when he grows up. So... what did these people sing to their daughters? Isn't there even *one* about growing up, getting married, and having your own kids (the presumed occupation of all these daughters, just like they knew in advance what their sons would likely do)?

2. And why are they all featuring moonlight and such? Okay, yes, children do (hopefully) sleep at night, but... didn't these children take naps during the day? Were our ancestors so different from us, only a few generations ago? Didn't their parents feel silly singing about how late it was and the moon was shining, when it *wasn't*? I know I sure do.

[identity profile] sayga.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
i can't think of any lullabyes that fall into either of those categories. i don't know about you, but i'd feel sillier singing to my baby about putting her to sleep in a tree than singing about moonlight. :P
maybe they only sang to their kids at night, when their husbands were home, because it was something a man would want a woman do to for his kids. or something. :P struggling to come up with a valid answer. or, maybe kids all slept in slings during the day and just woke and slept whenever they wanted and didn't need lulling to sleep.

lullabye -- lull to bye. hmm.

[identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 09:44 am (UTC)(link)
Whilst yours clearly makes more sense, the normal interpretation is far more fun :0D

[identity profile] sayga.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
wow, i want that hanging cradle... but there are no trees here big enough to hang it from.

and i never knew the correct spelling was lullaby (no e). hmm.

[identity profile] shenya.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
Coventry Carol doesn't mention either of those :). Ok, so it's kind of religious too... dates back to the sixteenth century.

Lully, lullay, Thou little tiny Child,
By, by, lully, lullay.

1. O sisters too, how may we do,
For to preserve this day
This poor Youngling for Whom we sing
By, by, lully, lullay?

2. Herod the king, in his raging,
Charged he hath this day
His men of might, in his own sight,
All young children to slay.

3. That woe is me, poor Child for Thee!
And ever morn and day
For Thy parting neither say nor sing,
By, by, lully, lullay.

Lully, lullay, Thou little tiny Child,
By, by, lully, lullay.

[identity profile] shenya.livejournal.com 2006-04-07 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry. That one was grabbed from a google, I don't remember the words that well. A medieval singing group that I turn up to very occasionally sang it recently. It's yummy in four-part harmony *grin*

[identity profile] shenya.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
And the one my mother used to sing us doesn't have either either.
I don't remember all the words, so I tend to make a bit up, but the gist of it:

Little birdie in a tree
in a tree
in a tree
Little birdie in a tree
Sing a song for me.

Sing about the ?(roses)
on the garden wall
Sing about the ?(poplars)
growing straight and tall

Little birdie in a tree
in a tree
in a tree
Little birdie in a tree
Sing a song for me.

[identity profile] lizziey.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 07:00 am (UTC)(link)
Silly girl.

Boys were too silly to be able to choose what to do, and thus needed to be told, and reminded every night. Girls are smart enough to choose for themselves, and thus don't need telling and reminding.

:)

[identity profile] sporks5000.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)
What about "all the pretty little horses"?

There. Connie's wrong and Austin's right because he has pointed out one exception. (It's not as if she didn't do a post on exactly this just a few months ago)

[identity profile] sporks5000.livejournal.com 2006-04-07 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
1) Or maybe it was a few weeks ago, or maybe it was a year plus ago. I'm actually not sure at all. I know that it was you, though, and I know that if it was in the past four months, I read it twice but did not reply to it, or else I would have been able to find it through my g-mail account.

2) Yeah, I tend to avoid that verse when ever possible.

[identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Brahm's lullaby (which is, to me, pretty much the definition of a lullaby) doesn't have any of that stuff. Although it's kinda religious. But if you sang it in the German you might not notice ;0)

[identity profile] sayga.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
i can't think of any lullabyes that fall into either of those categories. i don't know about you, but i'd feel sillier singing to my baby about putting her to sleep in a tree than singing about moonlight. :P
maybe they only sang to their kids at night, when their husbands were home, because it was something a man would want a woman do to for his kids. or something. :P struggling to come up with a valid answer. or, maybe kids all slept in slings during the day and just woke and slept whenever they wanted and didn't need lulling to sleep.

lullabye -- lull to bye. hmm.

[identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 09:44 am (UTC)(link)
Whilst yours clearly makes more sense, the normal interpretation is far more fun :0D

[identity profile] sayga.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
wow, i want that hanging cradle... but there are no trees here big enough to hang it from.

and i never knew the correct spelling was lullaby (no e). hmm.

[identity profile] shenya.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
Coventry Carol doesn't mention either of those :). Ok, so it's kind of religious too... dates back to the sixteenth century.

Lully, lullay, Thou little tiny Child,
By, by, lully, lullay.

1. O sisters too, how may we do,
For to preserve this day
This poor Youngling for Whom we sing
By, by, lully, lullay?

2. Herod the king, in his raging,
Charged he hath this day
His men of might, in his own sight,
All young children to slay.

3. That woe is me, poor Child for Thee!
And ever morn and day
For Thy parting neither say nor sing,
By, by, lully, lullay.

Lully, lullay, Thou little tiny Child,
By, by, lully, lullay.

[identity profile] shenya.livejournal.com 2006-04-07 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry. That one was grabbed from a google, I don't remember the words that well. A medieval singing group that I turn up to very occasionally sang it recently. It's yummy in four-part harmony *grin*

[identity profile] shenya.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
And the one my mother used to sing us doesn't have either either.
I don't remember all the words, so I tend to make a bit up, but the gist of it:

Little birdie in a tree
in a tree
in a tree
Little birdie in a tree
Sing a song for me.

Sing about the ?(roses)
on the garden wall
Sing about the ?(poplars)
growing straight and tall

Little birdie in a tree
in a tree
in a tree
Little birdie in a tree
Sing a song for me.

[identity profile] lizziey.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 07:00 am (UTC)(link)
Silly girl.

Boys were too silly to be able to choose what to do, and thus needed to be told, and reminded every night. Girls are smart enough to choose for themselves, and thus don't need telling and reminding.

:)

[identity profile] sporks5000.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 12:13 pm (UTC)(link)
What about "all the pretty little horses"?

There. Connie's wrong and Austin's right because he has pointed out one exception. (It's not as if she didn't do a post on exactly this just a few months ago)

[identity profile] sporks5000.livejournal.com 2006-04-07 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
1) Or maybe it was a few weeks ago, or maybe it was a year plus ago. I'm actually not sure at all. I know that it was you, though, and I know that if it was in the past four months, I read it twice but did not reply to it, or else I would have been able to find it through my g-mail account.

2) Yeah, I tend to avoid that verse when ever possible.

[identity profile] eofs.livejournal.com 2006-04-06 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Brahm's lullaby (which is, to me, pretty much the definition of a lullaby) doesn't have any of that stuff. Although it's kinda religious. But if you sang it in the German you might not notice ;0)