Entry tags:
So, I was thinking about Star Trek and conformity....
And in my thoughts, I was rantling-ing about how we keep getting these characters who are not-human, and how a big part of their development is showing them how they really want to be human. Human, of course, means NT.
And then I was thinking about how this push for normality goes beyond mental normality. Geordie's visor makes him able to see differently from other people. In some cases, this is an advantage - he can see things we can't. And yet, consistently, his big wish is to see normally. Why? Because that's better?
I can forgive Star Trek for a lot of things, like the idiotic Universal Translators (not possible, as near as I can see) and the fact that aliens all look human and have human facial expressions (cheaper, easier, kinder on the actors) and the fact that Earth culture = American culture (tell me why Picard quotes a lot of Shakespeare, but not much Moliere. I often wonder how different Star Trek would be if it had been done somewhere else) and the anti-religion bent (hey, I'm an agnostic, I'm not whining) but... this is starting to irritate me.
I don't want to re-invent the wheel here, so I went to google to see what has already been said. And can you believe that I didn't find anything? Clearly, I'm using the wrong search criteria. I cannot possibly be the only person who's wondered along these lines.
If I decide I am, expect a mild, and probably less-well-educated-than-it-should-be rant soon.
And then I was thinking about how this push for normality goes beyond mental normality. Geordie's visor makes him able to see differently from other people. In some cases, this is an advantage - he can see things we can't. And yet, consistently, his big wish is to see normally. Why? Because that's better?
I can forgive Star Trek for a lot of things, like the idiotic Universal Translators (not possible, as near as I can see) and the fact that aliens all look human and have human facial expressions (cheaper, easier, kinder on the actors) and the fact that Earth culture = American culture (tell me why Picard quotes a lot of Shakespeare, but not much Moliere. I often wonder how different Star Trek would be if it had been done somewhere else) and the anti-religion bent (hey, I'm an agnostic, I'm not whining) but... this is starting to irritate me.
I don't want to re-invent the wheel here, so I went to google to see what has already been said. And can you believe that I didn't find anything? Clearly, I'm using the wrong search criteria. I cannot possibly be the only person who's wondered along these lines.
If I decide I am, expect a mild, and probably less-well-educated-than-it-should-be rant soon.
no subject
Hence... Firefly! :-D
Err, not really, but... really, ST has its own world that is clearly American. If we want something else, we should really be looking at other sci-fi or perhaps inventing our own.
no subject
Theres some things to click through, and it's mostly Star Wars vs. Star Trek (with science!), but there are good essay/articles.
click on the top link (I want YOU for the Galactic Empire) on the front page, then on essays.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
My brother stopped watching Deep Space Nine because he thought it was too religious. He said they were pushing the Bajoran religion too much and it was just a well-disguised New-Age mentality.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Undiscovered Country: The Klingons, particularly Azetbur, actually vocalize discontent at the human-centric outlook of the Federation as one of the reasons they aren't exactly thrilled to take aid or alliance. The scene is played for laughs.
There's a definite edge of -- I'm not quite sure I'd call it racism, exactly, but definitely a kind of imperialism -- to the Trek humans. They're benevolent about it, but they're definitely convinced that their culture is the right one. It's a species-wide character flaw that would have been interesting to play with. I Roddenberry may have been leaning that way toward the end of his career, but, well, he's dead.
no subject
Hence... Firefly! :-D
Err, not really, but... really, ST has its own world that is clearly American. If we want something else, we should really be looking at other sci-fi or perhaps inventing our own.
no subject
Theres some things to click through, and it's mostly Star Wars vs. Star Trek (with science!), but there are good essay/articles.
click on the top link (I want YOU for the Galactic Empire) on the front page, then on essays.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
My brother stopped watching Deep Space Nine because he thought it was too religious. He said they were pushing the Bajoran religion too much and it was just a well-disguised New-Age mentality.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Undiscovered Country: The Klingons, particularly Azetbur, actually vocalize discontent at the human-centric outlook of the Federation as one of the reasons they aren't exactly thrilled to take aid or alliance. The scene is played for laughs.
There's a definite edge of -- I'm not quite sure I'd call it racism, exactly, but definitely a kind of imperialism -- to the Trek humans. They're benevolent about it, but they're definitely convinced that their culture is the right one. It's a species-wide character flaw that would have been interesting to play with. I Roddenberry may have been leaning that way toward the end of his career, but, well, he's dead.