![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
conuly
I think that the linguistic contortions people go through to use nouns in place of perfectly acceptable adjectives are insane, and draw more attention to the oh-so-stigmatizing disability than just speaking naturally.
However. Special needs is not an adjective. You can't be a "special needs child" because special modifies needs and needs doesn't modify anything, since it's a noun. It sounds stupid. It is stupid. The awkwardness of using a phrase in this manner, again, calls attention to those Very Special Needs ofBlossom whatever child that is. Stop it.
Additionally, I'd like to ask which needs a child might have (since it's always special needs child, never special needs person) that are special. I mean, so special that they merit this label. Don't all children have needs, some of which are unique? Or is it that most kids are all alike, and only a few are special enough to merit the label of doom?
However. Special needs is not an adjective. You can't be a "special needs child" because special modifies needs and needs doesn't modify anything, since it's a noun. It sounds stupid. It is stupid. The awkwardness of using a phrase in this manner, again, calls attention to those Very Special Needs of
Additionally, I'd like to ask which needs a child might have (since it's always special needs child, never special needs person) that are special. I mean, so special that they merit this label. Don't all children have needs, some of which are unique? Or is it that most kids are all alike, and only a few are special enough to merit the label of doom?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-01 03:41 am (UTC)Yup, but I never see that.
English has a long tradition of nouns modifying other nouns. Consider "apple pie" or "support board".
...
shutup