conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote 2011-03-23 01:51 pm (UTC)

Re: idk

1. Sanity, please.
2. No.
3. LOL - no. (Wait - maybe the genfic? I mean, it can't ALL be twincest, right?)
4. Nah, that should be watched.
5. Well... no, not with the various language issues. I'm not up to tackling that on my own.

But I get a nagging feeling you weren't being totally serious :P

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org