LiveJournal abuse has an arbitrary policy regarding showing a nipple in a default icon. They say, don't do it - make it into a non-default icon instead. They don't get into reasons of why there's a nipple, probably because they'd never get anything done if they did.
Whether this is good or bad, it's been policy. It wasn't new then, and it's not new now.
There may not have been any nipple in that icon. I don't know, I don't remember ever seeing it.
Both sides overreacted, and I agree, it was all started by a twit with a chip on his/her shoulder - but you'll note my conspicuous non-posting about it back in the day.
no subject
LiveJournal abuse has an arbitrary policy regarding showing a nipple in a default icon. They say, don't do it - make it into a non-default icon instead. They don't get into reasons of why there's a nipple, probably because they'd never get anything done if they did.
Whether this is good or bad, it's been policy. It wasn't new then, and it's not new now.
There may not have been any nipple in that icon. I don't know, I don't remember ever seeing it.
Both sides overreacted, and I agree, it was all started by a twit with a chip on his/her shoulder - but you'll note my conspicuous non-posting about it back in the day.