conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote2006-11-05 06:58 pm
Entry tags:

Today's random rage...

First we get the disabled girl who was sterilized and given hormones so she'd stay small (so she'd be easier to care for, an admirable goal, no matter how dubious the decision - and this is pretty damn dubious), naturally without her consent....

And just when you're getting over the WTF-ness of that....

Doctors: let us kill disabled babies (actual title!)

I haven't even gotten past the title yet. Taken a gander at the "related articles" section, with such gems as "Haunted mother who backs mercy killing" and "It's your right to die if you want to". Mind, I tend to agree with the second, disabled or not (though adding in proper help first, because it is a shame to up and kill yourself without a better reason than most seem to have), but it hardly applies to babies. I mean, let's say that word again - b a b y.

It's like we never left the dark ages. At least they were more honest about it, just stuck their unwanted children outside.

[identity profile] kibbles.livejournal.com 2006-11-06 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
First one, bizarre. I have the same fears with Ted but never would I think to keep him SMALL. And the second? If the kid is that bad, DNR is ok with me, I guess, but to actively kill? A disabled kid = disabled family? I can't speak.