conuly: (Default)
We've been having spotty internet lately, and have finally tracked down the problem: My router, which was cheap when I bought it, is eight years obsolete. I need to get a new one. Well, they can't possibly have gone up in price, so it won't break the bank, I don't think.

Gave away a kitten today. Apparently, this was Evangeline's favorite kitten. Tough for her. I didn't say it to her face, but I'm sure he'll be happier in a home with three doting grown-up people who are at home all day than in a home where his needier siblings hog most of the attention and the only one who dotes is six years old and still thinks he likes being hugged. (No, I don't let her squeeze kittens around the middle, even though she wants to.)

Anyway, on to those links!

Israelis Facing a Seismic Rift Over Role of Women
There are pictures


Read more... )

New Definition of Autism May Exclude Many, Study Suggests


Read more... )

Here's an article about segregated housing for vegetarians only in Bombay

And one on Bastøy, a very free prison in Norway

State notes alarming spike in starvation of adopted children. They list the signs of potential starvation in a child, but of course it's worth noting that with adopted children, many of these psychological signs (like hoarding food or bolting it down quickly) could be a sign that they went hungry BEFORE being adopted.

Report: Medical Marijuana Laws Reduced Traffic Fatalities

Texas doctors lead open-notes movement

And finally, BSG (remake) as an 8-bit RPG!
conuly: (can't)
Well, she's my mom.

Interestingly, during the same talk it came up about a few months earlier when my high school had found out that I DO NOT say the Pledge of Allegiance. And they called my mom, and then basically told me that she's not backing me up, and we came up with this lame-ass compromise where I was just late to third period every day.

Apparently what actually happened is my mother told them they were stupid, said she had no interest in fixing a problem caused by THEIR ignorance of MY rights, and said they should deal with it. Which they did... by lying to me about what my mother said.

I had thought this was remarkably inconsistent with my family, but it never occurred to me that the dean would just lie to my face. (Then again, after I had the guy for health the next term it should've. I seriously disliked him. Fortunately, the feeling was mutual and I ended up doing independent study. Nice when things work out, right?) OMFG! I should've sued!

Man, I am NEVER compromising my principles again just because my mother doesn't back me up, especially when she actually does. (No, I don't know why I didn't discuss it with her later that day. Maybe because it didn't occur to me there was anything to discuss? Who knew I was lied to? OMG!)

I'm seriously tempted to write the school a note about this. That was SO not right.

Coincidentally, here is an article about a group wanting to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from their local schools. Contrary to what people say, this would NOT prevent small children who wish to say the Pledge from saying it. Really, there's nothing stopping you from making your children say whatever silly things you like at home.

But going through the comments, here's the thing that I just don't get. Every time any issue regarding free speech comes up that can even tangentially be connected to atheism, hordes of people come out of the woodwork to go "Well, what about money? LOL, do you not use money because of in god we trust? LOL!!!!"

Aside from the fact that they think they're clever when they're really not, I don't understand why "in God we trust" is okay with Christians! Isn't there some kind of commandment about taking the Lord's name in vain? Doesn't it sort of cheapen your religion to have cheesy signs up in stores saying "In God's name we trust, all others pay cash"? Isn't it wrong to (to borrow some religious phrasing here) yoke God and mammon together? Isn't there something about moneylenders and camels and needs which I am SURE can somehow be applied to putting God's name (more or less) on cash???

It just doesn't make sense. Forget about whether or not it offends atheists, am I missing something? Why doesn't this offend Christians? I just. Don't. Get it.
conuly: Dr. Horrible quote: All the birds are singing, you're gonna die : ) (birds)
But not really, the article has been updated.

The comments are pretty much what you'd expect. If you enjoy a completely uneven battle of wits with trolls and fools, have fun! Otherwise... happy Ramadan if you're celebrating this month.
conuly: (creepy)
in some bird crap. So now they're not washing their car.

You probably could make that up, but why would you want to?

For something more upbeat, I for one would very much like to live in this house. But I'm not sure there are enough bookshelves. (And the first person to say you could accomplish the same thing with a few e-readers is gonna get banned. I don't want to hear it! You still need shelves for the Kindles and Nooks and what-all elses, right?)
conuly: Quote from Heroes by Claire - "Maybe being different isn't the end of the world, it's just who I am" (being different)
High School Student Stands Up Against Prayer at Public School and Is Ostracized, Demeaned and Threatened

I could, at this point, cherrypick a few telling Bible quotes to show these guys up as raging hypocrites... but I'm not going to do that. You know the drill, do it on your own.

Now, coincidentally, the same day I read that article I picked up a new book for the nieces, Penina Levine is a Hard-Boiled Egg. Had I read the blurb more carefully I probably wouldn't've. It turned out to be an "issues" boo, with the issue being that Penina's teacher is an ignoramus. Those, for whatever reason, don't tend to be as good as ones that aren't dominated by a single Important conflict. And this book isn't that great. It's okay, it doesn't have any real flaws that I'm going to go "Wow, this book sucks!", but it's nothing to write home about.

It has two negative reviews over on Amazon. One of them ran "I don't think the teacher's reaction makes sense, and it makes no logical sense that Penina would refuse to do the stupid Easter bunny assignment but be willing to go to church with her friend one day. She shouldn't mix religion with friendship!" (Not an actual quote.)

Now, it turned out that what the reviewer meant about the teacher is that she thinks it makes no sense for the woman to do a 180 by the end of the book after Penina's mom calls the principal. This makes more sense than what I thought she meant, but I still disagree. The teacher never really gets a clue, and acts more like somebody who had her ass handed to her than somebody who really understands about not trampling on the rights of the minority.

As far as visiting with her friend at church, I don't see - and said so - that it's inconsistent at all. CHOOSING to go with your friend to church (and not participating in anything that conflicts with your beliefs or makes you uncomfortable) is not at all the same as being forced or coerced to act as though other people's beliefs are your own.

And this is what really bugs me, is when people say ONE thing and then, when you disagree, claim they said something else. In a reply, the reviewer says that it's just WRONG for Jewish children to ever willingly enter a church because it's condoning years of terrible things done by Christians to Jews, and that SHE grew up without ever inviting her non-Jewish friends over for her holidays or giving them Christmas gifts or anything, and Penina isn't a good example.

Now, quite aside from the fact that there is a wide range of opinions on whether or not it's ever appropriate to participate in somebody else's holidays or worship services (and to what degree), this is not what her original point was. What she said at first is that it's illogical and inconsistent. And now she's saying that what she meant was it's just a bad thing to do. Say what you mean and mean what you say, people! Don't say one thing and then claim you meant something entirely different!

Ugh.

But you know, this person at least seems to have thought a little before reviewing. I disagree with some things she said, but she didn't just say whatever.

Check this one out.

If you can work out what this woman is even attempting to get at, please let me know. All I could figure out is that apparently if your grandma survived the Holocaust by hiding in a Catholic school run by nuns, she was "treading on and upsetting personal religions TRADITIONS" (emphasis hers - and I kinda think that taking (or not taking) Communion is more than a "tradition") and you should be ashamed of her and not let her visit your classroom. Or something. It was a good laugh until I opened up page 127 and figured out what the heck she was trying to talk about in that sentence.

These two links don't really go together, except in that they do.

*headdesk*

Feb. 24th, 2011 10:17 pm
conuly: A picture of the Castleton Castle. Quote: "Where are our dreams? Where are our castles?" (castle)
Tennessee Bill Wants to Make Shariah Law a Felony

I'm just going to quote Pat's Papers directly: Two Republican state legislators in Tennessee have introduced a bill that would make practicing Islamic Shariah law a felony, punishable by up to 15 years in prison. The bill categorizes any adherence to Shariah law—including prayers—as a “danger to homeland security” reports the Tennessean. Other states have attempted similar motions though most have focused on excluding Shariah law from US courtrooms. Critics call the bill “nonsense,” pointing out that “people of all faiths have to follow secular law.”

This is just silly. Aside from the snarking in the article ("Well, sharia law prohibits stealing, does this mean I should become a thief?") it's just absurd. "Well, of course, sharia law would have to apply to everybody and then they'd kill us all for not being Muslim! OMG!" Except... not so much. It's my understanding that things like sharia law (or, something more common in the US, Beth Din, the pluralization I'm not sure of) is optional. You have two parties who can't agree, and rather than take it to the secular courts they decide to take it to the appropriate religious courts instead. And why not? If you want your rabbi or your priest or your next door neighbor's cat to settle your dispute for you, who's to argue? So long as everybody agrees that this is the way to go, go you! It's just another form of alternative dispute resolution.

But - and correct me if I'm wrong here - in countries such as the US this is used for civil suits, not for criminal suits, mostly because you're not going to get the state to agree to try you in anything other than the state courts. So it pretty much as no effect on anybody outside the two parties who agreed to use this method.

Incidentally, speaking of Wikipedia, they say something interesting which I'm not going to try to back up at this time, instead trusting one of you to correct me if they're wrong:

One contribution Islamic law made to Western law, was the legal procedure. Until the Crusades, legal procedure in the West often consisted of "God's judgments" by boiling water (or another "ordeal") or by duel. By contrast, Islamic law decided on the basis of proof and allowed the defendants to express freely, a practice that had been established in the time of the second Caliph of Islam, Umar. Marcel Boisard argues that these procedures were transmitted to Europe via Louis IX, who instituted several reforms upon returning from the Crusades.[208]

If this is right, using the sarcasm employed earlier I can safely say... "Well, shariah law calls for a strict level of proof and for the defendants to, uh, defend themselves. You want to take that away?" Of course, that may very well be what some parties wish to do, but I'm a pessimist.
conuly: Good Omens quote: "Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous!" (armageddon)
For the first time, research shows that American creativity is declining. What went wrong—and how we can fix it.

I'm not entirely sure I believe this article, but there it is.

Here's a video on blizzards and long-term methods for traffic calming.

NYPD Cops' Training Included an Anti-Muslim Horror Flick. Other than the disturbing nature of this, it's not really worth reading past the title (which sums up what you need to know) unless you are masochistically inclined towards comment-reading. Half of them say that Muslims and Islam and Obama are all evil-evil-evil, and the others say that this video is the work of Zionist Jews who, along with Obama, are all evil-evil-evil.

Teachers are (unreasonably) cautious about teaching evolution in school. Again, I warn you - don't read the comments.

And there's this interesting article on a school in the Bronx. Actually, I have to say, the really interesting part is the pictures. My god, that school has got to have the ugliest uniform I have ever seen in a school. Orange and blue plaid? I fully admit that this is a shallow worldview, but... wow.

More on the school profiled is at Wikipedia.
conuly: Dr. Horrible quote: All the birds are singing, you're gonna die : ) (birds)
And let me just say that anybody who doesn't think that term is a little disturbing isn't thinking clearly about it. They're explicitly using a passage about having children like little arrows. If they were just about the kids, why not call themselves the "fruitful" movement?
conuly: Quote: "You only wish you were as cool as I am" (cool)
It's a chart detailing the various contradictions in the Bible. Even clicking on the image doesn't make it very big, you'll want to open the PDF.
conuly: (Default)
First, let me say that I'm told the previous article in diabetes IS, in fact, really bad. My apologies.

One on the avoidance of the term "rape" for children who clearly WERE raped.

On the trend of diagnosing children with bipolar disorder - worth reading

A 1960s parody of commercials

The Pope has more or less approved condom use by male prostitutes to prevent the spread of AIDS. This is one of those situations where, if you can get inside the logic that leads to "condoms for male hookers = yes, condoms for married couples = no" it makes internal sense. I guess.

On good airport security

Canada wants more immigrants.


Read more... )

For Catholics, Interest in Exorcism Is Revived

Read more... )

Cigarette Giants in Global Fight on Tighter Rules

Read more... )

Catholics in Belgium Start Parishes of Their Own

Read more... )



On Nov. 4, Anderson Cooper did the country a favor. He expertly deconstructed on his CNN show the bogus rumor that President Obama’s trip to Asia would cost $200 million a day. This was an important “story.” It underscored just how far ahead of his time Mark Twain was when he said a century before the Internet, “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.” But it also showed that there is an antidote to malicious journalism — and that’s good journalism....


Read more... )

For Saudi Women, Biggest Challenge Is Getting to Play

Read more... )

Small Cheesemaker Defies F.D.A. Over Recall

Read more... )

I.R.S. Sits on Data Pointing to Missing Children

Read more... )

Articles!

Oct. 8th, 2010 10:12 am
conuly: (Default)
In Fierce Opposition to a Muslim Center, Echoes of an Old Fight

The comments are absolutely worthless, but get a load of this gem:

"How true. We all remember Catholic suicide bombers and how they wanted to replace the US constitution by biblical law (is there such a thing?) and how they chanted "My Catholic God is Great" after cutting the heads of innocent Protestants"

1. No, honey, that's the largely Protestant fundies you're talking about.
2. I guess nobody remembers the Spanish Inquisition anymore?


Read more... )

Picture Books No Longer a Staple for Children
A woman misquoted in the article has her comment here.

My view is that if picture books aren't selling, it's because they only come in hardcover! I don't want to spend $16 on a new picture book when I can spend half that price on a longer chapter book! Sure, I can buy used, but that doesn't help the new books get printed, does it?


Read more... )

Some states may be drugging incarcerated kids to control their behavior. Well, no shit.

Here's a quote from a brilliant guy who thinks the government is going to force people to eat their veggies. LOL!

Children need more play

Not enough PWDs on TV, again I say "well, no shit"

Let's not forget the extrasolar earthlike planet

An article on renegade female Catholic priests.

Migrant ‘Villages’ Within Beijing Ignite Debate


Read more... )

An article on Romansh

Read more... )

One on dishes LIKE ratatouille

Read more... )

We may have found the cause of Colony Collapse Disorder!

Read more... )
conuly: Picture of a dandelion fluffball. Quote: "What is harmless about a dreamer?" (dreamer)
New Kellogg School Research Suggests a Colorblind Approach to Diversity May Frustrate Efforts to Identify and Confront Discrimination. No duh.

The Disease Called Perfection.

Time Lapse video of a compost pile

This WTF? inducing post by Nikki Grimes

An article on getting boys to read that confirms that literacy does not mean you understand logic.

"Dr. Robert Weis, a psychology professor at Denison University, confirmed this suspicion in a randomized controlled trial of the effect of video games on academic ability. Boys with video games at home, he found, spend more time playing them than reading, and their academic performance suffers substantially. Hard to believe, isn't it, but Science has spoken."

Or maybe boys who prefer video games to books are more likely to have video games than books.

"The secret to raising boys who read, I submit, is pretty simple—keep electronic media, especially video games and recreational Internet, under control (that is to say, almost completely absent). Then fill your shelves with good books. "

And you're also going to keep them from playing sports, you're going to keep them from exploring outside, you're going to keep them from having swordfights inside, you're going to keep them from masturbating, you're going to keep them from doing chores, right? Because the choice is screentime or books, not books and EVERYTHING ELSE, right?

That link comes from here which ultimately I got from here.

On bikeshare programs (and similar)

"But the question is whether most consumers would ever accept time share ownership of a bike or a blender. After a bike share program began in Denver, one gubernatorial candidate in Colorado attacked the program as un-American. "

Yup, you got it, a business model that allows you to pay to share a bike is un-American. Capitalism isn't American!


Read more... )

Some Obama Allies Fear School Lunch Bill Could Rob Food Stamp Program

Read more... )

Old West Traditions, and Tensions, at Rodeo

Read more... )

At Sukkah City, Religion Meets Whimsy

Read more... )

This house is only a few blocks from mine
Pics!


Read more... )

Their Moon Shot and Ours

Read more... )

Achieving Techno-Literacy

Read more... )
conuly: Quote from Veronica Mars - "Sometimes I'm even persnickety-ER" (persnickety)
Obama Tries to Calm Religious Tensions

Read more... )

Notice how he just kinda slides that mention of his deep Christian faith in there. I don't know why he bothers. The people who think he's secretly Satan-worshipping Muslim aren't going to believe him anyway - and the real problem is that these folks have this idiotic idea that it matters.

City Disavows Pastor’s Talk of Burning Koran

Read more... )

Chock Full o’Nuts Returns to Manhattan. But Is That Salmon on the Menu?

Chock Full o'Nuts is the <i>heavenly</i> coffee.... )

You know, the original words to that jingle said that "better coffee Rockefeller's money can't buy". My mother all of a sudden remembered that a few years ago, and talked about it for three days.

Profile

conuly: (Default)
conuly

May 2013

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 2425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2013 01:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios